<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-Hans-CN">
	<id>https://wiki.swarma.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jlyt007</id>
	<title>集智百科 - 复杂系统|人工智能|复杂科学|复杂网络|自组织 - 用户贡献 [zh-cn]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.swarma.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jlyt007"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.swarma.org/index.php/%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE/Jlyt007"/>
	<updated>2026-11-02T18:18:13Z</updated>
	<subtitle>用户贡献</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.swarma.org/index.php?title=%E4%B8%BB%E5%88%86%E5%B1%82&amp;diff=30099</id>
		<title>主分层</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.swarma.org/index.php?title=%E4%B8%BB%E5%88%86%E5%B1%82&amp;diff=30099"/>
		<updated>2022-04-10T06:50:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jlyt007：本词条由用户名初步翻译&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;本词条由[[用户名]]初步翻译&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Principal stratification''' is a [[statistical]] technique used in [[causal inference]] when adjusting results for post-treatment covariates. The idea is to identify underlying strata and then compute causal effects only within strata. It is a generalization of the local average treatment effect (LATE).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal stratification is a statistical technique used in causal inference when adjusting results for post-treatment covariates. The idea is to identify underlying strata and then compute causal effects only within strata. It is a generalization of the local average treatment effect (LATE).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
主分层是一种应用于因果推断的统计技术，它根据处置后协变量来调整因果效应。其基本思想是识别潜在的分层结构，然后只计算每一层的因果效应。这就是所谓的局部平均处理效应(LATE)。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Example==&lt;br /&gt;
An example of principal stratification is where there is attrition in a randomized controlled trial. With a binary post-treatment covariate (e.g. attrition) and a binary treatment (e.g. &amp;quot;treatment&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;control&amp;quot;) there are four possible strata in which subjects could be:&lt;br /&gt;
# those who always stay in the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who would always drop-out of the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the treatment group&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the control group&lt;br /&gt;
If the researcher knew the stratum for each subject then the researcher could compare outcomes only within the first stratum and estimate a valid causal effect for that population. The researcher does not know this information, however, so modelling assumptions are required to use this approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of principal stratification is where there is attrition in a randomized controlled trial. With a binary post-treatment covariate (e.g. attrition) and a binary treatment (e.g. &amp;quot;treatment&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;control&amp;quot;) there are four possible strata in which subjects could be:&lt;br /&gt;
# those who always stay in the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who would always drop-out of the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the treatment group&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the control group&lt;br /&gt;
If the researcher knew the stratum for each subject then the researcher could compare outcomes only within the first stratum and estimate a valid causal effect for that population. The researcher does not know this information, however, so modelling assumptions are required to use this approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
主分层的一个例子是随机对照试验的退出偏移问题。使用处置后的二元协变量(例如：退出)和二元处置变量(例如：“处置”和“对照”) ，受试者可能有四种情形：&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# 总是留在研究中的受试者，不管他们被分配了哪种治疗；&lt;br /&gt;
# 总是会退出研究的受试者，不管他们被分配了哪种治疗 ；&lt;br /&gt;
# 只有在分配到处置组时才退出的受试者；&lt;br /&gt;
# 只有在分配到对照组时才退出的受试者。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
如果研究人员知道每个受试者属于哪种情形，那么研究人员只需比较第一种情况下的结果，并估计出对该群提有效的因果效应。然而，研究人员并不知道这些信息，因此这种方法需要模型假设。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the principal stratification framework also permits providing bounds for the estimated effect (under different bounding assumptions), which is common in situations with attrition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the principal stratification framework also permits providing bounds for the estimated effect (under different bounding assumptions), which is common in situations with attrition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
使用主分层框架还允许为估计效应提供界限(在不同的界限假设下) ，这在退出偏移的情况下很常见。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In applied evaluation research, principal strata are commonly referred to as &amp;quot;endogenous&amp;quot; strata or &amp;quot;subgroups&amp;quot; and involve specialized methods of analysis for examining the effects of interventions or treatments in the medical and social sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In applied evaluation research, principal strata are commonly referred to as &amp;quot;endogenous&amp;quot; strata or &amp;quot;subgroups&amp;quot; and involve specialized methods of analysis for examining the effects of interventions or treatments in the medical and social sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
在评价研究应用中，主成分层通常被称为”内生”层或”亚群体”，并涉及专门的分析方法，用来检查医学和社会科学中的干预或处置的效果。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Instrumental variable]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rubin causal model]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Instrumental variable&lt;br /&gt;
*Rubin causal model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= = = = = = = = 工具变量 · 虚拟事实模型&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Cite journal|doi=10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00021.x |first1=Constantine E. |last1=Frangakis |first2=Donald B. |last2=Rubin |title=Principal stratification in causal inference |journal=Biometrics |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=21–9 |date=March 2002 |pmid=11890317|pmc=4137767 }} [http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~cfrangak/papers/preffects.pdf Preprint]&lt;br /&gt;
* Zhang, Junni L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Estimation of Causal Effects via Principal Stratification When Some Outcomes are Truncated by &amp;quot;Death&amp;quot;&amp;quot;, ''Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics'', 28: 353–368 {{doi|10.3102/10769986028004353}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Barnard, John; Frangakis, Constantine E.; Hill, Jennifer L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments&amp;quot;, ''[[Journal of the American Statistical Association]]'', 98, 299–323 {{doi|10.1198/016214503000071}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Roy, Jason; Hogan, Joseph W.;  [[Bess Marcus|Marcus, Bess H.]] (2008) &amp;quot;Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments&amp;quot;, ''Biostatistics'', 9 (2), 277–289. {{doi|10.1093/biostatistics/kxm027}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Egleston, Brian L.; Cropsey, Karen L.; Lazev, Amy B.; Heckman, Carolyn J.; (2010) &amp;quot;A tutorial on principal stratification-based sensitivity analysis: application to smoking cessation studies&amp;quot;, ''Clinical Trials'', 7 (3), 286–298. {{doi|10.1177/1740774510367811 }}&lt;br /&gt;
* Peck, L. R.; (2013) &amp;quot;On estimating experimental impacts on endogenous subgroups:  Part one of a methods note in three parts&amp;quot;, ''American Journal of Evaluation'', 34 (2), 225–236. {{doi|10.1177/1098214013481666}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Preprint&lt;br /&gt;
* Zhang, Junni L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Estimation of Causal Effects via Principal Stratification When Some Outcomes are Truncated by &amp;quot;Death&amp;quot;&amp;quot;, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28: 353–368 &lt;br /&gt;
*Barnard, John; Frangakis, Constantine E.; Hill, Jennifer L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments&amp;quot;, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 299–323 &lt;br /&gt;
*Roy, Jason; Hogan, Joseph W.;  Marcus, Bess H. (2008) &amp;quot;Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments&amp;quot;, Biostatistics, 9 (2), 277–289. &lt;br /&gt;
*Egleston, Brian L.; Cropsey, Karen L.; Lazev, Amy B.; Heckman, Carolyn J.; (2010) &amp;quot;A tutorial on principal stratification-based sensitivity analysis: application to smoking cessation studies&amp;quot;, Clinical Trials, 7 (3), 286–298. &lt;br /&gt;
* Peck, L. R.; (2013) &amp;quot;On estimating experimental impacts on endogenous subgroups:  Part one of a methods note in three parts&amp;quot;, American Journal of Evaluation, 34 (2), 225–236. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Preprint&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Zhang, Junni L.; Rubin, Donald B.(2003)“当某些结果被“死亡”截断时，通过主成分分层估计因果效应”，《教育与行为统计学杂志》 ，28:353-368 &lt;br /&gt;
* Barnard，John; Frangakis，Constantine e. ; Hill，Jennifer l. ; Rubin，Donald b。(2003)“破碎随机试验的主要分层方法”，《美国统计协会杂志》 ，98,299-323 &lt;br /&gt;
* Roy，Jason; Hogan，Joseph w. ; Marcus，Bess h. (2008)“2个主动治疗的随机试验的依从性的主要分层预测因子”，《生物统计学》 ，9(2) ，277-289。&lt;br /&gt;
* Egleston，Brian l. ; Cropsey，Karen l. ; Lazev，Amy b. ; Heckman，Carolyn j. ; (2010)“关于基于主要分层的敏感度分析: 应用于戒烟研究的教程”，《临床试验》 ，7(3) ，286-298。&lt;br /&gt;
* Peck，l. r. ; (2013)“ On estimating experimental impacts On endogenous subgroups: Part one of a methods note in three parts”，American Journal of Evaluation，34(2) ，225-236。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Principal Stratification}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Causal inference]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Statistical methods]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Category:Causal inference&lt;br /&gt;
Category:Statistical methods&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
类别: 因果推理类别: 统计方法&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{statistics-stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;This page was moved from [[wikipedia:en:Principal stratification]]. Its edit history can be viewed at [[主分层/edithistory]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:待整理页面]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jlyt007</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.swarma.org/index.php?title=%E4%B8%BB%E5%88%86%E5%B1%82&amp;diff=30098</id>
		<title>主分层</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.swarma.org/index.php?title=%E4%B8%BB%E5%88%86%E5%B1%82&amp;diff=30098"/>
		<updated>2022-04-10T06:49:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jlyt007：/* Example */ 本词条由用户名初步翻译&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;此词条暂由彩云小译翻译，翻译字数共396，未经人工整理和审校，带来阅读不便，请见谅。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Principal stratification''' is a [[statistical]] technique used in [[causal inference]] when adjusting results for post-treatment covariates. The idea is to identify underlying strata and then compute causal effects only within strata. It is a generalization of the local average treatment effect (LATE).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal stratification is a statistical technique used in causal inference when adjusting results for post-treatment covariates. The idea is to identify underlying strata and then compute causal effects only within strata. It is a generalization of the local average treatment effect (LATE).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
主分层是一种应用于因果推断的统计技术，它根据处置后协变量来调整因果效应。其基本思想是识别潜在的分层结构，然后只计算每一层的因果效应。这就是所谓的局部平均处理效应(LATE)。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Example==&lt;br /&gt;
An example of principal stratification is where there is attrition in a randomized controlled trial. With a binary post-treatment covariate (e.g. attrition) and a binary treatment (e.g. &amp;quot;treatment&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;control&amp;quot;) there are four possible strata in which subjects could be:&lt;br /&gt;
# those who always stay in the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who would always drop-out of the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the treatment group&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the control group&lt;br /&gt;
If the researcher knew the stratum for each subject then the researcher could compare outcomes only within the first stratum and estimate a valid causal effect for that population. The researcher does not know this information, however, so modelling assumptions are required to use this approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of principal stratification is where there is attrition in a randomized controlled trial. With a binary post-treatment covariate (e.g. attrition) and a binary treatment (e.g. &amp;quot;treatment&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;control&amp;quot;) there are four possible strata in which subjects could be:&lt;br /&gt;
# those who always stay in the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who would always drop-out of the study regardless of which treatment they were assigned&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the treatment group&lt;br /&gt;
# those who only drop-out if assigned to the control group&lt;br /&gt;
If the researcher knew the stratum for each subject then the researcher could compare outcomes only within the first stratum and estimate a valid causal effect for that population. The researcher does not know this information, however, so modelling assumptions are required to use this approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
主分层的一个例子是随机对照试验的退出偏移问题。使用处置后的二元协变量(例如：退出)和二元处置变量(例如：“处置”和“对照”) ，受试者可能有四种情形：&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# 总是留在研究中的受试者，不管他们被分配了哪种治疗；&lt;br /&gt;
# 总是会退出研究的受试者，不管他们被分配了哪种治疗 ；&lt;br /&gt;
# 只有在分配到处置组时才退出的受试者；&lt;br /&gt;
# 只有在分配到对照组时才退出的受试者。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
如果研究人员知道每个受试者属于哪种情形，那么研究人员只需比较第一种情况下的结果，并估计出对该群提有效的因果效应。然而，研究人员并不知道这些信息，因此这种方法需要模型假设。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the principal stratification framework also permits providing bounds for the estimated effect (under different bounding assumptions), which is common in situations with attrition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the principal stratification framework also permits providing bounds for the estimated effect (under different bounding assumptions), which is common in situations with attrition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
使用主分层框架还允许为估计效应提供界限(在不同的界限假设下) ，这在退出偏移的情况下很常见。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In applied evaluation research, principal strata are commonly referred to as &amp;quot;endogenous&amp;quot; strata or &amp;quot;subgroups&amp;quot; and involve specialized methods of analysis for examining the effects of interventions or treatments in the medical and social sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In applied evaluation research, principal strata are commonly referred to as &amp;quot;endogenous&amp;quot; strata or &amp;quot;subgroups&amp;quot; and involve specialized methods of analysis for examining the effects of interventions or treatments in the medical and social sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
在评价研究应用中，主成分层通常被称为”内生”层或”亚群体”，并涉及专门的分析方法，用来检查医学和社会科学中的干预或处置的效果。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Instrumental variable]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rubin causal model]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Instrumental variable&lt;br /&gt;
*Rubin causal model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= = = = = = = = 工具变量 · 虚拟事实模型&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Cite journal|doi=10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00021.x |first1=Constantine E. |last1=Frangakis |first2=Donald B. |last2=Rubin |title=Principal stratification in causal inference |journal=Biometrics |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=21–9 |date=March 2002 |pmid=11890317|pmc=4137767 }} [http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~cfrangak/papers/preffects.pdf Preprint]&lt;br /&gt;
* Zhang, Junni L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Estimation of Causal Effects via Principal Stratification When Some Outcomes are Truncated by &amp;quot;Death&amp;quot;&amp;quot;, ''Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics'', 28: 353–368 {{doi|10.3102/10769986028004353}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Barnard, John; Frangakis, Constantine E.; Hill, Jennifer L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments&amp;quot;, ''[[Journal of the American Statistical Association]]'', 98, 299–323 {{doi|10.1198/016214503000071}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Roy, Jason; Hogan, Joseph W.;  [[Bess Marcus|Marcus, Bess H.]] (2008) &amp;quot;Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments&amp;quot;, ''Biostatistics'', 9 (2), 277–289. {{doi|10.1093/biostatistics/kxm027}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Egleston, Brian L.; Cropsey, Karen L.; Lazev, Amy B.; Heckman, Carolyn J.; (2010) &amp;quot;A tutorial on principal stratification-based sensitivity analysis: application to smoking cessation studies&amp;quot;, ''Clinical Trials'', 7 (3), 286–298. {{doi|10.1177/1740774510367811 }}&lt;br /&gt;
* Peck, L. R.; (2013) &amp;quot;On estimating experimental impacts on endogenous subgroups:  Part one of a methods note in three parts&amp;quot;, ''American Journal of Evaluation'', 34 (2), 225–236. {{doi|10.1177/1098214013481666}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Preprint&lt;br /&gt;
* Zhang, Junni L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Estimation of Causal Effects via Principal Stratification When Some Outcomes are Truncated by &amp;quot;Death&amp;quot;&amp;quot;, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28: 353–368 &lt;br /&gt;
*Barnard, John; Frangakis, Constantine E.; Hill, Jennifer L.; Rubin, Donald B. (2003) &amp;quot;Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments&amp;quot;, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 299–323 &lt;br /&gt;
*Roy, Jason; Hogan, Joseph W.;  Marcus, Bess H. (2008) &amp;quot;Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments&amp;quot;, Biostatistics, 9 (2), 277–289. &lt;br /&gt;
*Egleston, Brian L.; Cropsey, Karen L.; Lazev, Amy B.; Heckman, Carolyn J.; (2010) &amp;quot;A tutorial on principal stratification-based sensitivity analysis: application to smoking cessation studies&amp;quot;, Clinical Trials, 7 (3), 286–298. &lt;br /&gt;
* Peck, L. R.; (2013) &amp;quot;On estimating experimental impacts on endogenous subgroups:  Part one of a methods note in three parts&amp;quot;, American Journal of Evaluation, 34 (2), 225–236. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Preprint&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Zhang, Junni L.; Rubin, Donald B.(2003)“当某些结果被“死亡”截断时，通过主成分分层估计因果效应”，《教育与行为统计学杂志》 ，28:353-368 &lt;br /&gt;
* Barnard，John; Frangakis，Constantine e. ; Hill，Jennifer l. ; Rubin，Donald b。(2003)“破碎随机试验的主要分层方法”，《美国统计协会杂志》 ，98,299-323 &lt;br /&gt;
* Roy，Jason; Hogan，Joseph w. ; Marcus，Bess h. (2008)“2个主动治疗的随机试验的依从性的主要分层预测因子”，《生物统计学》 ，9(2) ，277-289。&lt;br /&gt;
* Egleston，Brian l. ; Cropsey，Karen l. ; Lazev，Amy b. ; Heckman，Carolyn j. ; (2010)“关于基于主要分层的敏感度分析: 应用于戒烟研究的教程”，《临床试验》 ，7(3) ，286-298。&lt;br /&gt;
* Peck，l. r. ; (2013)“ On estimating experimental impacts On endogenous subgroups: Part one of a methods note in three parts”，American Journal of Evaluation，34(2) ，225-236。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Principal Stratification}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Causal inference]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Statistical methods]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Category:Causal inference&lt;br /&gt;
Category:Statistical methods&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
类别: 因果推理类别: 统计方法&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{statistics-stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;This page was moved from [[wikipedia:en:Principal stratification]]. Its edit history can be viewed at [[主分层/edithistory]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:待整理页面]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jlyt007</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>