更改

跳到导航 跳到搜索
添加5字节 、 2020年8月24日 (一) 20:27
第45行: 第45行:       −
==Etymology==
+
==起源 Etymology==
    
In the 1960s, statisticians and economists used terms like ''data fishing'' or ''data dredging'' to refer to what they considered the bad practice of analyzing data without an a-priori hypothesis. The term "data mining" was used in a similarly critical way by economist [[Michael Lovell]] in an article published in the ''[[Review of Economic Studies]]'' in 1983.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lovell|first=Michael C.|date=1983|title=Data Mining|journal=The Review of Economics and Statistics|volume=65|issue=1|pages=1–12|doi=10.2307/1924403|jstor=1924403}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Wojciech W. |last=Charemza |first2=Derek F. |last2=Deadman |title=New Directions in Econometric Practice |location=Aldershot |publisher=Edward Elgar |year=1992 |chapter=Data Mining |pages=14–31 |isbn=1-85278-461-X }}</ref> Lovell indicates that the practice "masquerades under a variety of aliases, ranging from "experimentation" (positive) to "fishing" or "snooping" (negative).
 
In the 1960s, statisticians and economists used terms like ''data fishing'' or ''data dredging'' to refer to what they considered the bad practice of analyzing data without an a-priori hypothesis. The term "data mining" was used in a similarly critical way by economist [[Michael Lovell]] in an article published in the ''[[Review of Economic Studies]]'' in 1983.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lovell|first=Michael C.|date=1983|title=Data Mining|journal=The Review of Economics and Statistics|volume=65|issue=1|pages=1–12|doi=10.2307/1924403|jstor=1924403}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Wojciech W. |last=Charemza |first2=Derek F. |last2=Deadman |title=New Directions in Econometric Practice |location=Aldershot |publisher=Edward Elgar |year=1992 |chapter=Data Mining |pages=14–31 |isbn=1-85278-461-X }}</ref> Lovell indicates that the practice "masquerades under a variety of aliases, ranging from "experimentation" (positive) to "fishing" or "snooping" (negative).
第68行: 第68行:     
在学术界,主要的研究论坛始于1995年,当时在 AAAI 的赞助下在蒙特利尔举行了第一次数据挖掘和知识发现国际会议(KDD-95)。会议由乌萨马 · 法耶兹和拉马萨米 · 乌图鲁萨米共同主持。一年后,也就是1996年,乌萨马 · 法耶兹(Usama Fayyad)创办了这本由克卢维尔(Kluwer)撰写的期刊,并将其命名为《数据挖掘与知识发现》(Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery) ,担任创刊主编。后来他创办了 SIGKDD 时事通讯 SIGKDD Explorations。Kdd 国际会议成为数据挖掘领域最高质量的会议,研究论文的接受率低于18% 。《数据挖掘与知识发现》是该领域的主要研究期刊。
 
在学术界,主要的研究论坛始于1995年,当时在 AAAI 的赞助下在蒙特利尔举行了第一次数据挖掘和知识发现国际会议(KDD-95)。会议由乌萨马 · 法耶兹和拉马萨米 · 乌图鲁萨米共同主持。一年后,也就是1996年,乌萨马 · 法耶兹(Usama Fayyad)创办了这本由克卢维尔(Kluwer)撰写的期刊,并将其命名为《数据挖掘与知识发现》(Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery) ,担任创刊主编。后来他创办了 SIGKDD 时事通讯 SIGKDD Explorations。Kdd 国际会议成为数据挖掘领域最高质量的会议,研究论文的接受率低于18% 。《数据挖掘与知识发现》是该领域的主要研究期刊。
  −
      
==Background==
 
==Background==
463

个编辑

导航菜单