463
个编辑
更改
跳到导航
跳到搜索
第418行：
第418行： − 根据欧洲的版权和数据库法律，未经版权所有者的许可对版权内作品(如 web 挖掘)进行挖掘是不合法的。在欧洲，数据库是纯粹的数据，可能没有版权，但数据库权利可能存在，因此数据挖掘受到受数据库指令保护的知识产权所有者权利的约束。根据 Hargreaves 审查的建议，这导致英国政府在2014年修订其版权法，允许内容挖掘作为一种限制和例外。英国是继日本之后第二个这样做的国家，日本在2009年引入了数据挖掘的例外。然而，由于信息社会指令(2001)的限制，英国的例外只允许非商业目的的内容挖掘。英国版权法也不允许合同条款和条件推翻这一规定。+ − 第426行：
第425行： − 2013年，欧洲委员会促进了利益攸关方在欧洲许可证标题下关于文本和数据挖掘的讨论。将重点放在解决这一法律问题上，如许可证而不是限制和例外，导致大学、研究人员、图书馆、民间社会团体和开放存取出版商的代表在2013年5月离开了利益攸关方对话。+ −
→数据挖掘与著作权法 Copyright law
Under European copyright and database laws, the mining of in-copyright works (such as by web mining) without the permission of the copyright owner is not legal. Where a database is pure data in Europe, it may be that there is no copyright but database rights may exist so data mining becomes subject to intellectual property owners' rights that are protected by the Database Directive. On the recommendation of the Hargreaves review, this led to the UK government to amend its copyright law in 2014 to allow content mining as a limitation and exception. The UK was the second country in the world to do so after Japan, which introduced an exception in 2009 for data mining. However, due to the restriction of the Information Society Directive (2001), the UK exception only allows content mining for non-commercial purposes. UK copyright law also does not allow this provision to be overridden by contractual terms and conditions.
Under European copyright and database laws, the mining of in-copyright works (such as by web mining) without the permission of the copyright owner is not legal. Where a database is pure data in Europe, it may be that there is no copyright but database rights may exist so data mining becomes subject to intellectual property owners' rights that are protected by the Database Directive. On the recommendation of the Hargreaves review, this led to the UK government to amend its copyright law in 2014 to allow content mining as a limitation and exception. The UK was the second country in the world to do so after Japan, which introduced an exception in 2009 for data mining. However, due to the restriction of the Information Society Directive (2001), the UK exception only allows content mining for non-commercial purposes. UK copyright law also does not allow this provision to be overridden by contractual terms and conditions.
根据欧洲版权法和数据库法，未经版权所有人许可而对版权作品进行挖掘（如通过网络挖掘）是不合法的。在欧洲，如果数据库是纯数据，可能没有版权，但数据库权利可能存在，因此数据挖掘受数据库指令保护的知识产权所有者的权利约束。根据《哈格里夫斯评论》（Hargreaves review）的建议，这导致英国政府在2014年修订了版权法，允许将内容挖掘作为一种限制和例外。英国是继日本之后世界上第二个这样做的国家，日本在2009年引入了数据挖掘的例外。然而，由于信息社会指令（2001年）的限制，英国是例外情况但是只允许非商业目的的内容挖掘。英国版权法也不允许合同条款和条件推翻这一规定。
The European Commission facilitated stakeholder discussion on text and data mining in 2013, under the title of Licences for Europe. The focus on the solution to this legal issue, such as licensing rather than limitations and exceptions, led to representatives of universities, researchers, libraries, civil society groups and open access publishers to leave the stakeholder dialogue in May 2013.
The European Commission facilitated stakeholder discussion on text and data mining in 2013, under the title of Licences for Europe. The focus on the solution to this legal issue, such as licensing rather than limitations and exceptions, led to representatives of universities, researchers, libraries, civil society groups and open access publishers to leave the stakeholder dialogue in May 2013.
2013年，欧盟委员会以“欧洲许可证”为题，推动了利益相关者对文本和数据挖掘的讨论。但他们将重点放在解决这一法律问题上，如许可证而不是限制和例外，导致大学、研究人员、图书馆、民间社会团体和开放获取出版商的代表于2013年5月离开了利益相关者对话。