更改

跳到导航 跳到搜索
添加40字节 、 2020年9月25日 (五) 19:29
第86行: 第86行:     
==Causes and effects==
 
==Causes and effects==
 +
'''<font color="#FF8000">因果 Causes And Effects </font>'''<br>
    
In a trust network, triadic closure is likely to develop due to the transitive property. If a node A trusts node B, and node B trusts node C, node A will have the basis to trust node C. In a social network, strong triadic closure occurs because there is increased opportunity for nodes A and C with common neighbor B to meet and therefore create at least weak ties. Node B also has the incentive to bring A and C together to decrease the latent stress in two separate relationships.<ref name=Easley/>
 
In a trust network, triadic closure is likely to develop due to the transitive property. If a node A trusts node B, and node B trusts node C, node A will have the basis to trust node C. In a social network, strong triadic closure occurs because there is increased opportunity for nodes A and C with common neighbor B to meet and therefore create at least weak ties. Node B also has the incentive to bring A and C together to decrease the latent stress in two separate relationships.<ref name=Easley/>
第91行: 第92行:  
In a trust network, triadic closure is likely to develop due to the transitive property. If a node A trusts node B, and node B trusts node C, node A will have the basis to trust node C. In a social network, strong triadic closure occurs because there is increased opportunity for nodes A and C with common neighbor B to meet and therefore create at least weak ties. Node B also has the incentive to bring A and C together to decrease the latent stress in two separate relationships.
 
In a trust network, triadic closure is likely to develop due to the transitive property. If a node A trusts node B, and node B trusts node C, node A will have the basis to trust node C. In a social network, strong triadic closure occurs because there is increased opportunity for nodes A and C with common neighbor B to meet and therefore create at least weak ties. Node B also has the incentive to bring A and C together to decrease the latent stress in two separate relationships.
   −
在信任网络中,由于三元闭包具有传递性,容易产生三元闭包。如果节点 a 信任节点 b,而节点 b 信任节点 c,则节点 a 将有信任节点 c 的基础。在社交网络中,强三元闭包的出现是因为与共同邻居 b 相遇的节点 a 和 c 有更多的机会相遇,从而产生至少个弱关系。节点 b 也有动机将 a 和 c 结合在一起,以减少两个独立关系中的潜在压力。
+
在信任网络中,由于传递属性,可能会发生三元闭包。 如果节点A信任节点B,并且节点B信任节点C,则节点A将具有信任节点C的基础。在社交网络中,会发生强烈的三元闭包,因为具有共同邻居B的节点A和C拥有更多的机会来满足并因此建立起相对薄弱的纽带。 节点B还具有将A和C聚在一起以减少两个单独关系中的潜在压力的动机。
 
        第99行: 第99行:  
Networks that stay true to this principle become highly interconnected and have very high clustering coefficients. However, networks that do not follow this principle turn out to be poorly connected and may suffer from instability once negative relations are included.
 
Networks that stay true to this principle become highly interconnected and have very high clustering coefficients. However, networks that do not follow this principle turn out to be poorly connected and may suffer from instability once negative relations are included.
   −
遵循这一原则的网络变得高度互联,并具有非常高的聚类系数。然而,不遵循这一原则的网络结果是连接不良,一旦包括负面关系,就可能遭受不稳定。
+
遵循此原理的网络将高度互连,并且具有很高的群集系数。 但是,不遵循该原理的网络连接不良,一旦包含负面关系,网络可能会变得不稳定。
 
        第122行: 第121行:     
根据现有关系的推荐,合作者的全球平均比例比个人从总体人口中随机选择新关系的比例要低。两个可能的影响是通过结构和信息化建设。结构构造起源于向高集聚性的倾向。这种信息结构来自于这样一种假设,即一个人知道一个朋友的朋友的某些事情,而不是一个随机的陌生人。
 
根据现有关系的推荐,合作者的全球平均比例比个人从总体人口中随机选择新关系的比例要低。两个可能的影响是通过结构和信息化建设。结构构造起源于向高集聚性的倾向。这种信息结构来自于这样一种假设,即一个人知道一个朋友的朋友的某些事情,而不是一个随机的陌生人。
  −
      
==Strong Triadic Closure Property and local bridges==
 
==Strong Triadic Closure Property and local bridges==
274

个编辑

导航菜单