80
个编辑
更改
跳到导航
跳到搜索
第26行：
第26行： − “重要性”的含义十分广泛，因此导致了许多不同的中心性定义方式。这些不同的定义方式大致可分为两类。+ 第32行：
第32行： − “重要性”可以被认为与一种跨网络的流动或传输有关。这允许根据它们认为重要的流类型对中心性进行分类。这两种方法都将中心性划分为不同的类别。进一步的推论是，适用于一个类别的中心性在（推广）应用于另一个类别时往往会“出错”。+
无编辑摘要
The word "importance" has a wide number of meanings, leading to many different definitions of centrality. Two categorization schemes have been proposed.
The word "importance" has a wide number of meanings, leading to many different definitions of centrality. Two categorization schemes have been proposed.
“重要性”的含义十分广泛，因此导致了许多不同的中心性定义方式。通常可以使用二分法将这些方式予以分类。
"Importance" can be conceived in relation to a type of flow or transfer across the network. This allows centralities to be classified by the type of flow they consider important.<ref name=Borgatti2005/> "Importance" can alternatively be conceived as involvement in the cohesiveness of the network. This allows centralities to be classified based on how they measure cohesiveness.<ref name="Borgatti2006">{{cite journal |last1= Borgatti |first1= Stephen P.|last2= Everett |first2= Martin G.|year= 2006 |title= A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality |journal=Social Networks |volume= 28|issue= 4|pages= 466–484|doi=10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005 |url= }}<!--|accessdate= July 11, 2014--></ref> Both of these approaches divide centralities in distinct categories. A further conclusion is that a centrality which is appropriate for one category will often "get it wrong" when applied to a different category.<ref name=Borgatti2005/>
"Importance" can be conceived in relation to a type of flow or transfer across the network. This allows centralities to be classified by the type of flow they consider important.<ref name=Borgatti2005/> "Importance" can alternatively be conceived as involvement in the cohesiveness of the network. This allows centralities to be classified based on how they measure cohesiveness.<ref name="Borgatti2006">{{cite journal |last1= Borgatti |first1= Stephen P.|last2= Everett |first2= Martin G.|year= 2006 |title= A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality |journal=Social Networks |volume= 28|issue= 4|pages= 466–484|doi=10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005 |url= }}<!--|accessdate= July 11, 2014--></ref> Both of these approaches divide centralities in distinct categories. A further conclusion is that a centrality which is appropriate for one category will often "get it wrong" when applied to a different category.<ref name=Borgatti2005/>
"Importance" can be conceived in relation to a type of flow or transfer across the network. This allows centralities to be classified by the type of flow they consider important. Both of these approaches divide centralities in distinct categories. A further conclusion is that a centrality which is appropriate for one category will often "get it wrong" when applied to a different category.
"Importance" can be conceived in relation to a type of flow or transfer across the network. This allows centralities to be classified by the type of flow they consider important. Both of these approaches divide centralities in distinct categories. A further conclusion is that a centrality which is appropriate for one category will often "get it wrong" when applied to a different category.
“重要性”可以被设想为与网络中的某种流动或传输有关。这使得我们可以根据重要流动或传输的类型，对中心性予以分类。这些方法将中心性划分于完全不同的类别中，也就是说适用于一种类别中的中心性往往无法适用于其他类别。<ref name="Borgatti2006">{{cite journal |last1= Borgatti |first1= Stephen P.|last2= Everett |first2= Martin G.|year= 2006 |title= A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality |journal=Social Networks |volume= 28|issue= 4|pages= 466–484|doi=10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005 |url= }}<!--|accessdate= July 11, 2014--></ref> Both of these approaches divide centralities in distinct categories. A further conclusion is that a centrality which is appropriate for one category will often "get it wrong" when applied to a different category.<ref name=Borgatti2005/>