更改

===复杂性经济学是主流，但非正统 Complexity economics as mainstream, but non-orthodox===

===复杂性经济学是主流，但非正统 Complexity economics as mainstream, but non-orthodox===

根据Colander（2000）、Colander、Holt&amp;Rosser（2004）和Davis（2008）的观点，当代主流经济学正朝着更加“折衷”<ref name=COL2000a>"Economists today are not neoclassical according to any reasonable definition of the term. They are far more eclectic, and concerned with different issues than were the economists of the early 1900s, whom the term was originally designed to describe." {{harvtxt|Colander|2000|p=130}}</ref><ref name=COL2000b>"Modern economics involves a broader world view and is far more eclectic than the neoclassical terminology allows." {{harvtxt|Colander|2000|p=133}}</ref>、多样化<ref name=CHR04a>"In our view, the interesting story in economics over the past decades is the increasing variance of acceptable views..." {{harvtxt|Colander|Holt|Rosser|2004|p=487}}</ref><ref name=CHR04b>"In work at the edge, ideas that previously had been considered central to economics are being modified and broadened, and the process is changing the very nature of economics." {{harvtxt|Colander|Holt|Rosser|2004|p=487}}</ref><ref name=CHR04c>"When certain members of the existing elite become open to new ideas, that openness allows new ideas to expand, develop, and integrate into the profession... These alternative channels allow the mainstream to expand, and to evolve to include a wider range of approaches and understandings... This, we believe, is already occurring in economics." </ref>和多元的的方法发展。<ref name=DAV2008a>"despite an increasing pluralism on the mainstream&nbsp;economics research&nbsp;frontier..." </ref> Colander，Holt&Rosser（2004）指出，当代主流经济学正在“远离对神圣的三位一体——理性、自私和均衡”的严格要求，并引用了复杂性经济学以及递归经济学和动力系统对这些趋势的贡献。<ref name=CHR04d>{{harvtxt|Colander|Holt|Rosser|2004|p=485}}</ref>他们将复杂性经济学归为主流、但非正统的一种研究方法。<ref name=CHR04e>"The second (Santa Fe) conference saw a very different outcome and atmosphere than the first. No longer were mainstream economists defensively adhering to general equilibrium orthodoxy... By 1997, the mainstream accepted many of the methods and approaches that were associated with the complexity approach." {{harvtxt|Colander|Holt|Rosser|2004|p=497}} {{harvtxt|Colander|Holt|Rosser|2004|pp=490–492}} distinguish between orthodox and mainstream economics.</ref><ref name=DAV2008b>{{harvtxt|Davis|2008|p=354}}</ref>

根据Colander（2000）、Colander、Holt&amp;Rosser（2004）和Davis（2008）的观点，当代主流经济学正朝着更加“折衷”<ref name=COL2000a>"Economists today are not neoclassical according to any reasonable definition of the term. They are far more eclectic, and concerned with different issues than were the economists of the early 1900s, whom the term was originally designed to describe." </ref><ref name=COL2000b>"Modern economics involves a broader world view and is far more eclectic than the neoclassical terminology allows." </ref>、多样化<ref name=CHR04a>"In our view, the interesting story in economics over the past decades is the increasing variance of acceptable views..." </ref><ref name=CHR04b>"In work at the edge, ideas that previously had been considered central to economics are being modified and broadened, and the process is changing the very nature of economics." </ref><ref name=CHR04c>"When certain members of the existing elite become open to new ideas, that openness allows new ideas to expand, develop, and integrate into the profession... These alternative channels allow the mainstream to expand, and to evolve to include a wider range of approaches and understandings... This, we believe, is already occurring in economics." </ref>和多元的的方法发展。<ref name=DAV2008a>"despite an increasing pluralism on the mainstream&nbsp;economics research&nbsp;frontier..." </ref> Colander，Holt&Rosser（2004）指出，当代主流经济学正在“远离对神圣的三位一体——理性、自私和均衡”的严格要求，并引用了复杂性经济学以及递归经济学和动力系统对这些趋势的贡献。<ref name=CHR04d></ref>他们将复杂性经济学归为主流、但非正统的一种研究方法。<ref name=CHR04e>"The second (Santa Fe) conference saw a very different outcome and atmosphere than the first. No longer were mainstream economists defensively adhering to general equilibrium orthodoxy... By 1997, the mainstream accepted many of the methods and approaches that were associated with the complexity approach." distinguish between orthodox and mainstream economics.</ref><ref name=DAV2008b></ref>

 

== 批评 Criticism ==

== 批评 Criticism ==