更改

自发秩序最突出的代表人物<ref>Hunt L. (2007) The Origin and Scope of Hayek’s Idea of Spontaneous Order. In: Hunt L., McNamara P. (eds) Liberalism, Conservatism, and Hayek’s Idea of Spontaneous Order. Palgrave Macmillan, New York</ref> 是应该是哈耶克。除了认为经济是一种自发秩序(他称之为“拓展秩序 catallaxy”)之外，他还认为普通法系<ref>The Constitution of Liberty; Law, Legislation and Liberty</ref> and the brain<ref>The Sensory Order</ref> 和大脑也是一种自发秩序。在《科学共和国》''The Republic of Science''<ref>http://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~gsd/595e/docs/41.%20Polanyi_Republic_of_Science.pdf{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> 中，Michael Polanyi也认为科学是一种自发秩序，这一理论由Bill Butos和Thomas McQuade在多篇论文中进一步讨论和研究。Gus DiZerega认为民主是政府的自发秩序形式<ref>Persuasion, Power, and Polity</ref> ，David Andersson认为在像美国这样的地方宗教也是自发秩序,<ref>{{cite book|title=Persuasion, Power and Polity: A Theory of Democratic Self-Organization (Advances in Systems Theory, Complexity, and the Human Sciences) (9781572732575): Gus Dizerega, Alfonso Montuori: Books |date=2001-02-10 |isbn = 978-1572732575|last1 = Dizerega|first1 = Gus}}</ref>，Troy Camplin认为艺术和文学作品也是自发秩序<ref>{{cite web|url=http://studiesinemergentorder.org/current-issue/sieo3-195/ |title=pp.195-211: Troy Earl Camplin |publisher=Studies in Emergent Order |date= 2010-08-20|accessdate=2018-09-17}}</ref> 。Paul Krugman在他的《自组织经济》''The Self-Organizing Economy''一书<ref>The Self-Organizing Economy</ref>中也对自发秩序理论做出了贡献，他在书中声称城市是自组织的系统。可信性理论认为，社会制度的可信性是制度内生自组织及其持续性的驱动因素。<ref name=Grabel>{{cite journal |last= Grabel |first= Ilene |title= The political economy of 'policy credibility': the new-classical macroeconomics and the remaking of emerging economies |url= http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/1.abstract |journal= Cambridge Journal of Economics |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=1–19 |doi= 10.1093/cje/24.1.1|access-date= 20 October 2016|year= 2000 |citeseerx= 10.1.1.366.5380 }}</ref>

自发秩序最突出的代表人物<ref>Hunt L. (2007) The Origin and Scope of Hayek’s Idea of Spontaneous Order. In: Hunt L., McNamara P. (eds) Liberalism, Conservatism, and Hayek’s Idea of Spontaneous Order. Palgrave Macmillan, New York</ref> 是应该是哈耶克。除了认为经济是一种自发秩序(他称之为“拓展秩序 catallaxy”)之外，他还认为普通法系<ref>The Constitution of Liberty; Law, Legislation and Liberty</ref>和大脑<ref>The Sensory Order</ref>也是一种自发秩序。在《科学共和国》''The Republic of Science''<ref>http://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~gsd/595e/docs/41.%20Polanyi_Republic_of_Science.pdf</ref> 中，Michael Polanyi也认为科学是一种自发秩序，这一理论由Bill Butos和Thomas McQuade在多篇论文中进一步讨论和研究。Gus DiZerega认为民主是政府的自发秩序形式<ref>Persuasion, Power, and Polity</ref> ，David Andersson认为在像美国这样的地方宗教也是自发秩序,<ref>{{cite book|title=Persuasion, Power and Polity: A Theory of Democratic Self-Organization (Advances in Systems Theory, Complexity, and the Human Sciences) (9781572732575): Gus Dizerega, Alfonso Montuori: Books |date=2001-02-10 |isbn = 978-1572732575}}</ref>，Troy Camplin认为艺术和文学作品也是自发秩序<ref>{{cite web|url=http://studiesinemergentorder.org/current-issue/sieo3-195/ |title=pp.195-211: Troy Earl Camplin |publisher=Studies in Emergent Order |date= 2010-08-20|accessdate=2018-09-17}}</ref> 。Paul Krugman在他的《自组织经济》''The Self-Organizing Economy''一书<ref>The Self-Organizing Economy</ref>中也对自发秩序理论做出了贡献，他在书中声称城市是自组织的系统。可信性理论认为，社会制度的可信性是制度内生自组织及其持续性的驱动因素。<ref name=Grabel>{{cite journal |last= Grabel |first= Ilene |title= The political economy of 'policy credibility': the new-classical macroeconomics and the remaking of emerging economies |url= http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/1.abstract |journal= Cambridge Journal of Economics |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=1–19 |doi= 10.1093/cje/24.1.1|access-date= 20 October 2016|year= 2000 |citeseerx= 10.1.1.366.5380 }}</ref>

大量自私自利的个人之间的竞争将导致许多可能的收入分配。在所有可能的收入分配中，指数型收入分配的发生概率最高，遵循“最大生存可能”的自然选择过程，指数型收入分配最有可能进化和生存，因此被Tao称为“自发秩序”<ref name="springer1"/>。通过分析从欧洲到拉丁美洲、北美和亚洲的66个国家和香港特别行政区的家庭收入数据集，Tao等人发现，对于所有这些国家，绝大多数人口(低收入和中等收入阶层)的收入分布遵循指数分布。<ref>Yong Tao et al. Exponential structure of income inequality: evidence from 67 countries. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination (2017) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11403-017-0211-6</ref>

大量自私自利的个人之间的竞争将导致许多可能的收入分配。在所有可能的收入分配中，指数型收入分配的发生概率最高，遵循“最大生存可能”的自然选择过程，指数型收入分配最有可能进化和生存，因此被Tao称为“自发秩序”<ref name="springer1"/>。通过分析从欧洲到拉丁美洲、北美和亚洲的66个国家和香港特别行政区的家庭收入数据集，Tao等人发现，对于所有这些国家，绝大多数人口(低收入和中等收入阶层)的收入分布遵循指数分布。<ref>Yong Tao et al. Exponential structure of income inequality: evidence from 67 countries. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination (2017) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11403-017-0211-6</ref>

=== 参见 ===

=== 参见 ===