387
个编辑
更改
跳到导航
跳到搜索
第87行：
第87行： − # Stratified randomization firstly divides samples into several strata with reference to prognostic factors but there is possible that the samples are unable to be divided. In application, the significance of prognostic factors lacks strict approval in some cases, which could further result in bias. This is why the factors' potential for making effects to result should be checked before the factors are included in stratification. In some cases that the impact of factors on the outcome cannot be approved, unstratified randomization is suggested.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041615/what-are-advantages-and-disadvantages-stratified-random-sampling.asp|title=Pros and Cons of Stratified Random Sampling|last=Murphy|first=Chris B.|date=Apr 13, 2019|website=Investopedia|language=en|access-date=2020-04-07}}</ref> 第100行：
第99行： − + +
→缺点 Disadvantage
The limits of stratified randomization include:
The limits of stratified randomization include:
分层随机试验的限制包括：
分层随机试验的限制包括：
#分层随机试验首先参考预后因素将样本分成若干层，但有可能无法划分样本。在应用中，在某些情况下，预后因素的重要性缺乏严格的认可，这可能进一步导致偏差。这就是为什么在将因素纳入分层之前应该检查因素产生影响的潜力的原因。在某些因素对结果的影响无法得到批准（approved）的情况下，建议进行无分层随机试验。 <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041615/what-are-advantages-and-disadvantages-stratified-random-sampling.asp|title=Pros and Cons of Stratified Random Sampling|last=Murphy|first=Chris B.|date=Apr 13, 2019|website=Investopedia|language=en|access-date=2020-04-07}}</ref>
#分层随机试验首先参考预后因素将样本分成若干层，但有可能无法划分样本。在应用中，在某些情况下，预后因素的重要性缺乏严格的认可，这可能进一步导致偏差。这就是为什么在将因素纳入分层之前应该检查因素产生影响的潜力的原因。在某些因素对结果的影响无法得到批准（approved）的情况下，建议进行无分层随机试验。 <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041615/what-are-advantages-and-disadvantages-stratified-random-sampling.asp|title=Pros and Cons of Stratified Random Sampling|last=Murphy|first=Chris B.|date=Apr 13, 2019|website=Investopedia|language=en|access-date=2020-04-07}}</ref>
{{Citation|last1=Glass|first1=Aenne|title=Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of Stratification in Methods of Randomization|date=2014|work=Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics|pages=239–246|publisher=Springer New York|isbn=978-1-4939-2103-4|last2=Kundt|first2=Guenther|doi=10.1007/978-1-4939-2104-1_23}}</ref>
{{Citation|last1=Glass|first1=Aenne|title=Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of Stratification in Methods of Randomization|date=2014|work=Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics|pages=239–246|publisher=Springer New York|isbn=978-1-4939-2103-4|last2=Kundt|first2=Guenther|doi=10.1007/978-1-4939-2104-1_23}}</ref>
# Stratified sampling can not be applied if the population cannot be completely assigned into strata, which would result in sample sizes proportional to sample available instead of overall subgroup population.<ref name=":0" />
# Stratified sampling can not be applied if the population cannot be completely assigned into strata, which would result in sample sizes proportional to sample available instead of overall subgroup population.<ref name=":0" />
#如果人口不能完全分配到层中，则不能应用分层抽样，这将导致样本大小与可用样本成正比，而不是与总体子组人口成正比。 [7]
#如果人口不能完全分配到层中，则不能应用分层抽样，这将导致样本大小与可用样本成正比，而不是与总体子组人口成正比。<ref name=":0" />
# The process of assigning samples into subgroups could involve overlapping if subjects meet the inclusion standard of multiple strata, which could result in a misrepresentation of the population.<ref name=":2" />
# The process of assigning samples into subgroups could involve overlapping if subjects meet the inclusion standard of multiple strata, which could result in a misrepresentation of the population.<ref name=":2" />
#如果受试者符合多层次的纳入标准，则将样本分配到亚组的过程可能涉及重叠，这可能导致总体的错误陈述。<ref name=":2">
#如果受试者符合多层次的纳入标准，则将样本分配到亚组的过程可能涉及重叠，这可能导致总体的错误陈述。<ref name=":2">