| | 模型规模的改变主要体现在训练计算量,模型参数量和训练数据集的大小<ref name=":1">Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361, 2020. URL <nowiki>https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361</nowiki></ref><ref name=":2">Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. NeurIPS, 2022. URL <nowiki>https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556</nowiki>.</ref>这三个因素上。研究者通常会分析模型的能力随训练计算量或模型参数量的增加而变化的曲线,而不会绘制针对训练集大小的曲线。通常,每个模型的训练计算量是以 FLOPs (Floating Point Operations, 浮点运算数) 来衡量的<ref name=":2" />。模型能力关于参数量与模型能力关于 FLOPs 有形状相似的曲线,这是因为大多数密集Transformer语言模型家族(即采用[[全连接自注意力机制]]的模型)的训练计算量大致与模型参数量成比例<ref name=":1" />。研究者通常在训练模型时使用固定大小的训练集<ref name=":3">Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D. Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. NeurIPS, 2020. URL https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html</ref><ref name=":4">Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, et al. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training Gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446, 2021. URL <nowiki>https://arxiv.org/abs/</nowiki> 2112.11446.</ref>,因此较难见到模型能力随训练数据集大小而变化的报告。下表<ref name=":0" />列出了一些大语言模型的涌现能力及其出现的规模(以训练所需的浮点运算次数和模型参数数量衡量)。 | | 模型规模的改变主要体现在训练计算量,模型参数量和训练数据集的大小<ref name=":1">Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361, 2020. URL <nowiki>https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361</nowiki></ref><ref name=":2">Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. NeurIPS, 2022. URL <nowiki>https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556</nowiki>.</ref>这三个因素上。研究者通常会分析模型的能力随训练计算量或模型参数量的增加而变化的曲线,而不会绘制针对训练集大小的曲线。通常,每个模型的训练计算量是以 FLOPs (Floating Point Operations, 浮点运算数) 来衡量的<ref name=":2" />。模型能力关于参数量与模型能力关于 FLOPs 有形状相似的曲线,这是因为大多数密集Transformer语言模型家族(即采用[[全连接自注意力机制]]的模型)的训练计算量大致与模型参数量成比例<ref name=":1" />。研究者通常在训练模型时使用固定大小的训练集<ref name=":3">Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D. Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. NeurIPS, 2020. URL https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html</ref><ref name=":4">Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, et al. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training Gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446, 2021. URL <nowiki>https://arxiv.org/abs/</nowiki> 2112.11446.</ref>,因此较难见到模型能力随训练数据集大小而变化的报告。下表<ref name=":0" />列出了一些大语言模型的涌现能力及其出现的规模(以训练所需的浮点运算次数和模型参数数量衡量)。 |
| | * '''BIG-Bench.''' BIG-Bench是一个用于语言模型评估的众包基准测试套件,包含超过200个基准测试<ref name="BigBench2022">BIG-Bench. Beyond the imitation game: Measuring and extrapolating the capabilities of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.04615, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04615.</ref>,下图A-D展示了来自BIG-Bench的四种表现出涌现的任务。图A展示了一个算术计算基准测试,测试3位数加减法以及2位数乘法。GPT-3和LaMDA<ref name="Thoppilan202">Thoppilan, R., De Freitas, D., Hall, J., Shazeer, N., Kulshreshtha, A., Cheng, H-T., Jin, A., Bos, T., Baker, L., Du, Y. et al. LaMDA: Language models for dialog applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08239. </ref>在训练计算量为几个数量级时准确率接近零,之后,GPT-3的训练计算量在达到2 × 10<sup>22</sup> FLOPs(约有13B参数),LaMDA达到10<sup>23</sup> FLOPs(约为68B参数)时,模型能力急剧跃升至远高于随机水平。类似的涌现行为也发生在相同规模的其他任务上,例如国际音标转写(图B)、从混乱字母中恢复单词(图C)以及波斯语问答(图D)。 | | * '''BIG-Bench.''' BIG-Bench是一个用于语言模型评估的众包基准测试套件,包含超过200个基准测试<ref name="BigBench2022">BIG-Bench. Beyond the imitation game: Measuring and extrapolating the capabilities of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.04615, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04615.</ref>,下图A-D展示了来自BIG-Bench的四种表现出涌现的任务。图A展示了一个算术计算基准测试,测试3位数加减法以及2位数乘法。GPT-3和LaMDA<ref name="Thoppilan202">Thoppilan, R., De Freitas, D., Hall, J., Shazeer, N., Kulshreshtha, A., Cheng, H-T., Jin, A., Bos, T., Baker, L., Du, Y. et al. LaMDA: Language models for dialog applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08239. </ref>在训练计算量为几个数量级时准确率接近零,之后,GPT-3的训练计算量在达到2 × 10<sup>22</sup> FLOPs(约有13B参数),LaMDA达到10<sup>23</sup> FLOPs(约为68B参数)时,模型能力急剧跃升至远高于随机水平。类似的涌现行为也发生在相同规模的其他任务上,例如国际音标转写(图B)、从混乱字母中恢复单词(图C)以及波斯语问答(图D)。 |