| | By examining group behavior through the lens of cybernetics, sociologists can seek the reasons for such spontaneous events as [[smart mob]]s and [[riots]], as well as how communities develop rules such as etiquette by consensus without formal discussion.{{Citation needed|date=November 2009}} [[Affect Control Theory]] explains [[role]] behavior, [[emotion]]s, and [[labeling theory]] in terms of homeostatic maintenance of sentiments associated with cultural categories. The most comprehensive attempt ever made in the social sciences to increase cybernetics in a generalized theory of society was made by [[Talcott Parsons]]. In this way, cybernetics establishes the basic hierarchy in Parsons' [[AGIL paradigm]], which is the ordering system-dimension of his [[action theory (sociology)|action theory]]. These and other cybernetic models in sociology are reviewed in a book edited by McClelland and Fararo.<ref name="McClelland">McClelland, Kent A., and Thomas J. Fararo (Eds.). 2006. Purpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</ref> | | By examining group behavior through the lens of cybernetics, sociologists can seek the reasons for such spontaneous events as [[smart mob]]s and [[riots]], as well as how communities develop rules such as etiquette by consensus without formal discussion.{{Citation needed|date=November 2009}} [[Affect Control Theory]] explains [[role]] behavior, [[emotion]]s, and [[labeling theory]] in terms of homeostatic maintenance of sentiments associated with cultural categories. The most comprehensive attempt ever made in the social sciences to increase cybernetics in a generalized theory of society was made by [[Talcott Parsons]]. In this way, cybernetics establishes the basic hierarchy in Parsons' [[AGIL paradigm]], which is the ordering system-dimension of his [[action theory (sociology)|action theory]]. These and other cybernetic models in sociology are reviewed in a book edited by McClelland and Fararo.<ref name="McClelland">McClelland, Kent A., and Thomas J. Fararo (Eds.). 2006. Purpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</ref> |
| − | * [[Memetics]] {{Citation needed|date=July 2015}} | + | 通过从控制论的角度审视群体行为,社会学家可以寻找暴徒和暴动等自发事件的原因,以及社区如何在没有正式讨论的情况下通过共识制定礼节之类的规则等。 情感控制理论从与文化类别相关的情绪的体内维持角度解释了角色行为,情绪和标签理论。'''塔尔科特·帕森斯 Talcott Parsons'''在社会科学领域做出了最全面的尝试,以在广义的社会理论中增加控制论。通过这种方式,控制论在帕森斯的AGIL范式中建立了基本的层次结构,即他的行动理论的有序系统维度。<ref name="McClelland">McClelland, Kent A., and Thomas J. Fararo (Eds.). 2006. Purpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</ref> |