更改

删除22字节 、 2020年9月25日 (五) 20:33
第143行: 第143行:     
==Causes and effects==
 
==Causes and effects==
 +
因果<br>
         −
=== Causes ===
+
== Causes ==
 +
原因<br>
    
{{Unreferenced section|date=July 2020}}
 
{{Unreferenced section|date=July 2020}}
第154行: 第156行:  
Geography: Baseline homophily often arises when the people who are located nearby also have similar characteristics. People are more likely to have contact with those who are geographically closer than those who are distant. Technology such as the telephone, e-mail, and social networks have reduced but not eliminated this effect.
 
Geography: Baseline homophily often arises when the people who are located nearby also have similar characteristics. People are more likely to have contact with those who are geographically closer than those who are distant. Technology such as the telephone, e-mail, and social networks have reduced but not eliminated this effect.
   −
地理位置: 当周围的人也有相似的特征时,基线同质性常常出现。人们更有可能与那些地理上比较近的人接触,而不是那些距离较远的人。电话、电子邮件和社交网络等技术已经减少但并未消除这种影响。
+
地理环境:当附近的人也具有相似的特征时,通常会产生基线同质性。 人们更可能与地理位置较远的人接触。 电话,电子邮件和社交网络等技术已经减少但并未消除这种影响。
 
        第162行: 第163行:  
Family ties: Family relationships often produce relatively close, frequent contact among those who are at great geographic distance. These ties tend to decay slowly, but can be dramatically restructured when new marriages occur.
 
Family ties: Family relationships often produce relatively close, frequent contact among those who are at great geographic distance. These ties tend to decay slowly, but can be dramatically restructured when new marriages occur.
   −
家庭关系: 家庭关系往往产生相对密切,频繁的接触之间的地理距离很远。这些关系往往会缓慢衰退,但当新的婚姻出现时,它们可以戏剧性地重组。
+
'''<font color="#FF8000">家庭关系 Family Ties </font>''':家庭关系通常会在相距遥远的人之间产生相对紧密的频繁联系。 这些纽带趋向于缓慢衰减,但是当新婚发生时,它们可以显着地重组。
 
        第170行: 第170行:  
Organizations: School, work, and volunteer activities provide the great majority of non-family ties. Many friendships, confiding relations, and social support ties are formed within voluntary groups. The social homogeneity of most organizations creates a strong baseline homophily in networks that are formed there.
 
Organizations: School, work, and volunteer activities provide the great majority of non-family ties. Many friendships, confiding relations, and social support ties are formed within voluntary groups. The social homogeneity of most organizations creates a strong baseline homophily in networks that are formed there.
   −
组织: 学校、工作和志愿者活动提供了绝大多数的非家庭纽带。许多友谊、信任关系和社会支持关系都是在志愿者团体中形成的。大多数组织的社会同质性在形成的网络中创造了一个强大的基线同质性。
+
组织:学校,工作和志愿者活动提供了绝大多数的非家庭纽带。 志愿团体内部建立了许多友谊,信任关系和社会支持纽带。 大多数组织的社会同质性在形成于其中的网络中建立了强大的基线同质性。
 
        第178行: 第177行:  
Isomorphic sources: The connections between people who occupy equivalent roles will induce homophily in the system of network ties. This is common in three domains: workplace (e.g., all heads of HR departments will tend to associate with other HR heads), family (e.g., mothers tend to associate with other mothers), and informal networks.
 
Isomorphic sources: The connections between people who occupy equivalent roles will induce homophily in the system of network ties. This is common in three domains: workplace (e.g., all heads of HR departments will tend to associate with other HR heads), family (e.g., mothers tend to associate with other mothers), and informal networks.
   −
同构性来源: 在网络关系系统中,身处同等角色的人之间的联系会导致同构性。这在三个领域很常见: 工作场所(例如,所有人力资源部门的负责人都倾向于与其他人力资源负责人联系)、家庭(例如,母亲倾向于与其他母亲联系)和非正式网络。
+
同构信息源:扮演同等角色的人们之间的联系将导致网络联系系统中的同质。 这在三个领域很常见:工作场所(例如,人力资源部门的所有负责人都倾向于与其他人力资源负责人联系),家庭(例如,母亲倾向于与其他母亲联系)以及非正式网络。
 
        第186行: 第184行:  
Cognitive processes: People who have demographic similarity tend to own shared knowledge, and therefore they have a greater ease of communication and share cultural tastes, which can also generate homophily.
 
Cognitive processes: People who have demographic similarity tend to own shared knowledge, and therefore they have a greater ease of communication and share cultural tastes, which can also generate homophily.
   −
认知过程: 人口统计学上相似的人倾向于拥有共享的知识,因此他们有更大的交流和共享的文化品味,这也可以产生同质性。
+
认知过程:具有人口统计学相似性的人倾向于拥有共同的知识,因此他们更容易交流和分享文化品味,也可能产生同质性。
      −
 
+
==Effects==
===Effects===
+
结果<br>
    
According to one study, [[perception]] of [[Interpersonal attraction|interpersonal]] similarity improves coordination and increase the expected payoff of interactions, above and beyond the effect of merely "liking others."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Chierchia|first1=Gabriele|last2=Coricelli|first2=Giorgio|title=The impact of perceived similarity on tacit coordination: propensity for matching and aversion to decoupling choices|journal=Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience|doi=10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00202|pmid=26283940|pmc=4516978|volume=9|pages=202|year=2015}}</ref> Another study claims that homophily produces [[Social tolerance|tolerance]] and cooperation in [[Social space|social spaces]].<ref name=":0">{{cite journal|last1=Mark|first1=N. P.|title=Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches|journal=American Sociological Review|date=2003|volume=68|issue=3|pages=319–345|jstor=1519727|doi=10.2307/1519727}}</ref> However, homophilic patterns can also restrict access to information or inclusion for minorities.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Karimi|first=Fariba|last2=Génois|first2=Mathieu|last3=Wagner|first3=Claudia|last4=Singer|first4=Philipp|last5=Strohmaier|first5=Markus|date=2018-07-23|title=Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks|journal=Scientific Reports|volume=8|issue=1|pages=11077|doi=10.1038/s41598-018-29405-7|pmid=30038426|bibcode=2018NatSR...811077K|issn=2045-2322|doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
According to one study, [[perception]] of [[Interpersonal attraction|interpersonal]] similarity improves coordination and increase the expected payoff of interactions, above and beyond the effect of merely "liking others."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Chierchia|first1=Gabriele|last2=Coricelli|first2=Giorgio|title=The impact of perceived similarity on tacit coordination: propensity for matching and aversion to decoupling choices|journal=Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience|doi=10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00202|pmid=26283940|pmc=4516978|volume=9|pages=202|year=2015}}</ref> Another study claims that homophily produces [[Social tolerance|tolerance]] and cooperation in [[Social space|social spaces]].<ref name=":0">{{cite journal|last1=Mark|first1=N. P.|title=Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches|journal=American Sociological Review|date=2003|volume=68|issue=3|pages=319–345|jstor=1519727|doi=10.2307/1519727}}</ref> However, homophilic patterns can also restrict access to information or inclusion for minorities.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Karimi|first=Fariba|last2=Génois|first2=Mathieu|last3=Wagner|first3=Claudia|last4=Singer|first4=Philipp|last5=Strohmaier|first5=Markus|date=2018-07-23|title=Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks|journal=Scientific Reports|volume=8|issue=1|pages=11077|doi=10.1038/s41598-018-29405-7|pmid=30038426|bibcode=2018NatSR...811077K|issn=2045-2322|doi-access=free}}</ref>
第196行: 第194行:  
According to one study, perception of interpersonal similarity improves coordination and increase the expected payoff of interactions, above and beyond the effect of merely "liking others." Another study claims that homophily produces tolerance and cooperation in social spaces. However, homophilic patterns can also restrict access to information or inclusion for minorities.
 
According to one study, perception of interpersonal similarity improves coordination and increase the expected payoff of interactions, above and beyond the effect of merely "liking others." Another study claims that homophily produces tolerance and cooperation in social spaces. However, homophilic patterns can also restrict access to information or inclusion for minorities.
   −
根据一项研究,人际相似性感知可以改善协调性,提高互动的预期回报,远远超过仅仅“喜欢他人”的效果另一项研究声称,同质性在社会空间产生宽容与合作。然而,同源模式也会限制少数族裔获取信息或包容性。
+
根据一项研究,对人际相似性的感知不仅可以“喜欢他人”,还可以提高协调能力并增加预期的互动收益。 另一项研究声称同质在社会空间中产生宽容与合作。 但是,同质模式也可能限制少数群体获得信息或将其纳入。
 
        第204行: 第201行:  
The effects of homophily on the diffusion of information and behaviors are also complex. Some studies have claimed that homophily facilitates access information, the diffusion of innovations and behaviors, and the formation of social norms. Other studies, however, highlight mechanisms through which homophily can maintain disagreement, exacerbate polarization of opinions, and slow the formation of an overall consensus.
 
The effects of homophily on the diffusion of information and behaviors are also complex. Some studies have claimed that homophily facilitates access information, the diffusion of innovations and behaviors, and the formation of social norms. Other studies, however, highlight mechanisms through which homophily can maintain disagreement, exacerbate polarization of opinions, and slow the formation of an overall consensus.
   −
同质性对信息和行为扩散的影响也是复杂的。一些研究声称,同质性促进了信息的获取,创新产品渗透理论和行为,以及社会规范的形成。然而,其他的研究强调了同质性可以维持分歧,加剧意见的两极分化,并减缓整体共识形成的机制。
+
同质性对信息和行为传播的影响也很复杂。 一些研究声称,同质促进了信息的获取,创新和行为的传播以及社会规范的形成。 但是,其他研究强调了同质可以维持分歧,加剧意见分歧和减缓整体共识形成的机制。
 
        第212行: 第208行:  
Homophily is a cause of homogamy—marriage between people with similar characteristics. Homophily is a fertility factor; an increased fertility is seen in people with a tendency to seek acquaintance among those with common characteristics.
 
Homophily is a cause of homogamy—marriage between people with similar characteristics. Homophily is a fertility factor; an increased fertility is seen in people with a tendency to seek acquaintance among those with common characteristics.
   −
同质性是同质婚姻的一个原因ーー具有相似特征的人之间的婚姻。同质性是一种 F质粒,人们倾向于在具有共同特征的人群中寻求熟人,这种倾向会导致生育力的提高。
+
同性恋是同性婚姻的原因,即具有相似特征的人之间的婚姻。 同性恋是一个生育因素。 在具有共同特征的人中倾向于结识的人会发现生育力增加。
 
  −
 
      
==See also==
 
==See also==
274

个编辑