387
个编辑
更改
→缺点 Disadvantage
#如果受试者符合多层次的纳入标准，则将样本分配到亚组的过程可能涉及重叠，这可能导致总体的错误陈述。<ref name=":2">
#如果受试者符合多层次的纳入标准，则将样本分配到亚组的过程可能涉及重叠，这可能导致总体的错误陈述。<ref name=":2">
==参考文献==
== Advantage ==
The advantages of stratified randomization include:
# Stratified randomization can accurately reflect the outcomes of the general population since influential factors are applied to stratify the entire samples and balance the samples' vital characteristics among treatment groups. For instance, applying stratified randomization to make a sample of 100 from the population can guarantee the balance of males and females in each treatment group, while using simple randomization might result in only 20 males in one group and 80 males in another group.<ref name=":0" />
# Stratified randomization makes a smaller error than other sampling methods such as [[cluster sampling]], simple random sampling, and [[systematic sampling]] or [http://dissertation.laerd.com/non-probability-sampling.php non-probability methods] since measurements within strata could be made to have a lower [[standard deviation]]. Randomizing divided strata are more manageable and cheaper in some cases than simply randomizing general samples.<ref name=":1" />
{{Citation|last1=Glass|first1=Aenne|title=Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of Stratification in Methods of Randomization|date=2014|work=Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics|pages=239–246|publisher=Springer New York|isbn=978-1-4939-2103-4|last2=Kundt|first2=Guenther|doi=10.1007/978-1-4939-2104-1_23}}</ref>
{{Citation|last1=Glass|first1=Aenne|title=Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of Stratification in Methods of Randomization|date=2014|work=Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics|pages=239–246|publisher=Springer New York|isbn=978-1-4939-2103-4|last2=Kundt|first2=Guenther|doi=10.1007/978-1-4939-2104-1_23}}</ref>