| − | <ref name=Schmid_2008>P. J. Schmid and J. Sesterhenn, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, in 61st Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics, American Physical Society, 2008. (Cited on pp. 249, 258)</ref><ref name=Schmid_2010>P. J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, J. Fluid Mech., 656 (2010), pp. 5--28. (Cited on pp. 231, 237, 238, 249, 250, 255, 258, 284, 292)</ref>在[[流体动力学]]领域引入,已迅速成为从数据中近似 Koopman [[算子]]的标准算法。它是一种能够从数值[[模拟]]或实验测量的[[时间序列]]中直接提取[[时空相干结构]]的[[数据分析]]方法。该方法不依赖于流动的系统矩阵,而是基于切片数据之间存在线性演化[[算子]]的假设。通过近似该[[算子]]的[[特征值]],我们可以将复杂的流场分解为具有单一特定[[频率]]和增长/衰减率的“动态模态”<ref name=Rowley_2009>C. W. Rowley, I. Mezi\' c, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. Henningson, Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows, J. Fluid Mech., 645 (2009), pp. 115--127. (Cited on pp. 231, 237, 238, 246, 249, 255, 256, 258, 259, 284, 292)</ref><ref name=Tu_2014> J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, D. M. Luchtenburg, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz, On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications, J. Comput. Dynam., 1 (2014), pp. 391--421. </ref>。其结果本质上可视为[[线性系统]]的全局稳定性模态或[[非线性系统]]的线性切向近似。 | + | <ref name=Schmid_2008 /><ref name=Schmid_2010 />在[[流体动力学]]领域引入,已迅速成为从数据中近似 Koopman [[算子]]的标准算法。它是一种能够从数值[[模拟]]或实验测量的[[时间序列]]中直接提取[[时空相干结构]]的[[数据分析]]方法。该方法不依赖于流动的系统矩阵,而是基于切片数据之间存在线性演化[[算子]]的假设。通过近似该[[算子]]的[[特征值]],我们可以将复杂的流场分解为具有单一特定[[频率]]和增长/衰减率的“动态模态”<ref name=Rowley_2009>C. W. Rowley, I. Mezi\' c, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. Henningson, Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows, J. Fluid Mech., 645 (2009), pp. 115--127. (Cited on pp. 231, 237, 238, 246, 249, 255, 256, 258, 259, 284, 292)</ref><ref name=Tu_2014> J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, D. M. Luchtenburg, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz, On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications, J. Comput. Dynam., 1 (2014), pp. 391--421. </ref>。其结果本质上可视为[[线性系统]]的全局稳定性模态或[[非线性系统]]的线性切向近似。 |