更改

跳到导航 跳到搜索
添加224字节 、 2020年9月14日 (一) 22:48
第215行: 第215行:  
在1995-1997年的出版物中,美国科学记者约翰·霍根(John Horgan)嘲笑该运动是“复杂性 Complexity、混乱 Chaos、灾难 Catastrophe和控制论 Cybernetics”的“失败潮流”中的第四个C。
 
在1995-1997年的出版物中,美国科学记者约翰·霍根(John Horgan)嘲笑该运动是“复杂性 Complexity、混乱 Chaos、灾难 Catastrophe和控制论 Cybernetics”的“失败潮流”中的第四个C。
    +
  --[[用户:CecileLi|CecileLi]]([[用户讨论:CecileLi|讨论]])  【审校】补充翻译:“1997年,霍根撰文指出这种方式已经引起了一些有力的隐喻/广为人知的潜在作用:蝴蝶效应,”
    
Rosser "granted" Horgan "that it  is hard to identify a concrete and surprising discovery (rather than "mere metaphor") that has arisen due to the emergence of complexity analysis" in the discussion journal of the [[American Economic Association]], the ''[[Journal of Economic Perspectives]]''.<ref name=Rosser1999/>  Surveying economic studies based on complexity science, Rosser wrote that the findings, rather than being surprising, confirmed "already-observed facts."<ref name=Rosser1999/> Rosser wrote that there has been "little work on empirical techniques for testing dispersed&nbsp;agent complexity&nbsp;models."<ref name=Rosser1999/> Nonetheless, Rosser wrote that "there is a strain of common perspective that has been accumulating as the four C's of cybernetics, catastrophe, chaos, and complexity emerged, which may now be reaching a critical mass in terms of influencing the thinking of economists more broadly."<ref name=Rosser1999/>
 
Rosser "granted" Horgan "that it  is hard to identify a concrete and surprising discovery (rather than "mere metaphor") that has arisen due to the emergence of complexity analysis" in the discussion journal of the [[American Economic Association]], the ''[[Journal of Economic Perspectives]]''.<ref name=Rosser1999/>  Surveying economic studies based on complexity science, Rosser wrote that the findings, rather than being surprising, confirmed "already-observed facts."<ref name=Rosser1999/> Rosser wrote that there has been "little work on empirical techniques for testing dispersed&nbsp;agent complexity&nbsp;models."<ref name=Rosser1999/> Nonetheless, Rosser wrote that "there is a strain of common perspective that has been accumulating as the four C's of cybernetics, catastrophe, chaos, and complexity emerged, which may now be reaching a critical mass in terms of influencing the thinking of economists more broadly."<ref name=Rosser1999/>
526

个编辑

导航菜单