58
个编辑
更改
跳到导航
跳到搜索
第228行：
第228行： − 如果要考虑人际关系的紧张程度，人们可能会认为有必要用一个有价值的代数图来表示心理社会现实。但事实上，定义一个图表的平衡似乎几近不可能，不是出于数学上的原因，而是出于心理学上的原因。如果 AB 的关系是 + 3，BC 的关系是-4，那么 AC 的关系应该是什么才能使三角形平衡？心理学上的假设是匮乏的，或者更确切地说，这些假设数量众多缺乏合理性。+ − --[[用户:趣木木|趣木木]]（[[用户讨论:趣木木|讨论]]）【翻译反馈】“定义一个图表的平衡似乎几近不可能” 该句是否没有经过人工翻译 似乎几近是否重复？
→Criticism
One might think that a valued algebraic graph is necessary to represent psycho-social reality, if it is to take into account the degree of intensity of interpersonal relationships. But in fact it then seems hardly possible to define the balance of a graph, not for mathematical but for psychological reasons. If the relationship AB is +3, the relationship BC is –4, what should the AC relationship be in order that the triangle be balanced? The psychological hypotheses are wanting, or rather they are numerous and little justified.
One might think that a valued algebraic graph is necessary to represent psycho-social reality, if it is to take into account the degree of intensity of interpersonal relationships. But in fact it then seems hardly possible to define the balance of a graph, not for mathematical but for psychological reasons. If the relationship AB is +3, the relationship BC is –4, what should the AC relationship be in order that the triangle be balanced? The psychological hypotheses are wanting, or rather they are numerous and little justified.
如果要考虑人际关系的紧张程度，人们可能会认为有必要用一个有价值的代数图来表示心理社会现实。但事实上，定义一个图表的平衡几乎不可能，不是出于数学上的原因，而是出于心理学上的原因。如果 AB 的关系是 + 3，BC 的关系是-4，那么 AC 的关系应该是什么才能使三角形平衡？心理学上的假设是匮乏的，或者更确切地说，这些假设数量众多缺乏合理性。
At the 1975 Dartmouth College colloquium on balance theory, Bo Anderson struck at the heart of the notion:<ref>Bo Anderson (1979) "Cognitive Balance Theory and Social Network Analysis: Remarks on some fundamental theoretical matters", pages 453 to 69 in ''Perspectives on Social Network Research'', see page 462.</ref>
At the 1975 Dartmouth College colloquium on balance theory, Bo Anderson struck at the heart of the notion:<ref>Bo Anderson (1979) "Cognitive Balance Theory and Social Network Analysis: Remarks on some fundamental theoretical matters", pages 453 to 69 in ''Perspectives on Social Network Research'', see page 462.</ref>