更改

The fluctuation-dissipation theorem connects the two to establish a concrete correspondence of "temperature", "entropy", "free potential/energy", and other physics notions to an economics system.  The statistical mechanics model is not constructed a-priori - it is a result of a boundedly rational assumption and modeling on existing neoclassical models.  It has been used to prove the "inevitability of collusion" result of Huw Dixon in a case for which the neoclassical version of the model does not predict collusion.   

The fluctuation-dissipation theorem connects the two to establish a concrete correspondence of "temperature", "entropy", "free potential/energy", and other physics notions to an economics system.  The statistical mechanics model is not constructed a-priori - it is a result of a boundedly rational assumption and modeling on existing neoclassical models.  It has been used to prove the "inevitability of collusion" result of Huw Dixon in a case for which the neoclassical version of the model does not predict collusion.   

涨落耗散定理将二者联系起来，建立了“温度”、“熵”、“自由势/能”以及其他物理概念与经济系统的具体对应关系。统计力学模型不是先验构建的，它是有限理性假设和现有新古典主义模型建模的结果。在一个新古典主义模型不能预测合谋的案例中，它被用来证明 Huw Dixon 的“合谋的必然性”结果。

涨落耗散定理将二者联系起来，建立了“温度”、“熵”、“自由势/能”以及其他物理概念与经济系统的具体对应关系。统计力学模型不是先验构建的，它是有限理性假设和现有新古典主义模型建模的结果。在一个新古典主义模型不能预测合谋的案例中，它被用来证明'''<font color="#ff8000">休·迪克森 Huw Dixon</font>'''的“合谋的必然性”结果。

Here the demand is increasing, as with [[Veblen good]]s or stock buyers with the [[Hot-hand fallacy#Consumers|"hot hand"]] fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.<ref name="Johnson2005">

Here the demand is increasing, as with [[Veblen good]]s or stock buyers with the [[Hot-hand fallacy#Consumers|"hot hand"]] fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.<ref name="Johnson2005">

Here the demand is increasing, as with Veblen goods or stock buyers with the "hot hand" fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.

Here the demand is increasing, as with Veblen goods or stock buyers with the "hot hand" fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.

这里的需求正在增加，就像 Veblen 的产品或有“热手”谬论的股票买家，他们更愿意买入更多成功的股票，卖出那些不那么成功的股票。

这里的需求正在增加，就像'''<font color="#ff8000">韦伯伦商品 Veblen good</font>'''  或有'''<font color="#ff8000">短期持续性 Hot Hand</font>'''谬论的股票买家，他们更愿意买入更多成功的股票，卖出那些不那么成功的股票。

{{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Joseph|author2=Tellis, G.J. |author3=Macinnis, D.J. |s2cid=145211986|title=Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=2005|volume=2|issue=32|pages=324–329|doi=10.1086/432241}}</ref>

{{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Joseph|author2=Tellis, G.J. |author3=Macinnis, D.J. |s2cid=145211986|title=Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=2005|volume=2|issue=32|pages=324–329|doi=10.1086/432241}}</ref>