第112行: |
第112行: |
| The fluctuation-dissipation theorem connects the two to establish a concrete correspondence of "temperature", "entropy", "free potential/energy", and other physics notions to an economics system. The statistical mechanics model is not constructed a-priori - it is a result of a boundedly rational assumption and modeling on existing neoclassical models. It has been used to prove the "inevitability of collusion" result of Huw Dixon in a case for which the neoclassical version of the model does not predict collusion. | | The fluctuation-dissipation theorem connects the two to establish a concrete correspondence of "temperature", "entropy", "free potential/energy", and other physics notions to an economics system. The statistical mechanics model is not constructed a-priori - it is a result of a boundedly rational assumption and modeling on existing neoclassical models. It has been used to prove the "inevitability of collusion" result of Huw Dixon in a case for which the neoclassical version of the model does not predict collusion. |
| | | |
− | 涨落耗散定理将二者联系起来,建立了“温度”、“熵”、“自由势/能”以及其他物理概念与经济系统的具体对应关系。统计力学模型不是先验构建的,它是有限理性假设和现有新古典主义模型建模的结果。在一个新古典主义模型不能预测合谋的案例中,它被用来证明 Huw Dixon 的“合谋的必然性”结果。 | + | 涨落耗散定理将二者联系起来,建立了“温度”、“熵”、“自由势/能”以及其他物理概念与经济系统的具体对应关系。统计力学模型不是先验构建的,它是有限理性假设和现有新古典主义模型建模的结果。在一个新古典主义模型不能预测合谋的案例中,它被用来证明'''<font color="#ff8000">休·迪克森 Huw Dixon</font>'''的“合谋的必然性”结果。 |
| | | |
| Here the demand is increasing, as with [[Veblen good]]s or stock buyers with the [[Hot-hand fallacy#Consumers|"hot hand"]] fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.<ref name="Johnson2005"> | | Here the demand is increasing, as with [[Veblen good]]s or stock buyers with the [[Hot-hand fallacy#Consumers|"hot hand"]] fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.<ref name="Johnson2005"> |
第118行: |
第118行: |
| Here the demand is increasing, as with Veblen goods or stock buyers with the "hot hand" fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful. | | Here the demand is increasing, as with Veblen goods or stock buyers with the "hot hand" fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful. |
| | | |
− | 这里的需求正在增加,就像 Veblen 的产品或有“热手”谬论的股票买家,他们更愿意买入更多成功的股票,卖出那些不那么成功的股票。 | + | 这里的需求正在增加,就像'''<font color="#ff8000">韦伯伦商品 Veblen good</font>''' 或有'''<font color="#ff8000">短期持续性 Hot Hand</font>'''谬论的股票买家,他们更愿意买入更多成功的股票,卖出那些不那么成功的股票。 |
| | | |
| {{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Joseph|author2=Tellis, G.J. |author3=Macinnis, D.J. |s2cid=145211986|title=Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=2005|volume=2|issue=32|pages=324–329|doi=10.1086/432241}}</ref> | | {{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Joseph|author2=Tellis, G.J. |author3=Macinnis, D.J. |s2cid=145211986|title=Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=2005|volume=2|issue=32|pages=324–329|doi=10.1086/432241}}</ref> |