更改

<blockquote>The non-classical nature of the superposition process is brought out clearly if we consider the superposition of two states, A and B, such that there exists an observation which, when made on the system in state A, is certain to lead to one particular result, a say, and when made on the system in state B is certain to lead to some different result, b say. What will be the result of the observation when made on the system in the superposed state? The answer is that the result will be sometimes a and sometimes b, according to a probability law depending on the relative weights of A and B in the superposition process. It will never be different from both a and b [i.e., either a or b]. The intermediate character of the state formed by superposition thus expresses itself through the probability of a particular result for an observation being intermediate between the corresponding probabilities for the original states, not through the result itself being intermediate between the corresponding results for the original states.</blockquote>

<blockquote>The non-classical nature of the superposition process is brought out clearly if we consider the superposition of two states, A and B, such that there exists an observation which, when made on the system in state A, is certain to lead to one particular result, a say, and when made on the system in state B is certain to lead to some different result, b say. What will be the result of the observation when made on the system in the superposed state? The answer is that the result will be sometimes a and sometimes b, according to a probability law depending on the relative weights of A and B in the superposition process. It will never be different from both a and b [i.e., either a or b]. The intermediate character of the state formed by superposition thus expresses itself through the probability of a particular result for an observation being intermediate between the corresponding probabilities for the original states, not through the result itself being intermediate between the corresponding results for the original states.</blockquote>

<blockquote>如果我们考虑两个态A和B的叠加，那么叠加过程的非经典性质就清楚地显示出来了，这样就存在一个观测，当对处于A态的系统进行观测时，它肯定会导致一个特定的结果，比如说，B说，当在B状态下对系统进行修改时，肯定会导致一些不同的结果。当对处于叠加状态的系统进行观测时，会有什么结果？答案是，根据概率定律，结果有时是a，有时是b，这取决于叠加过程中a和b的相对权重。它永远不会与a和b（即a或b）不同。因此，由叠加形成的状态的中间性质通过观察的特定结果介于原始状态的相应概率之间的概率来表示，而不是通过结果本身介于原始状态的相应结果之间。</blockquote >

<blockquote>如果我们考虑两个态A和B的叠加，那么叠加过程的非经典性质就清楚地显示出来了，这样就存在一个观测，当对处于A态的系统进行观测时，它肯定会导致一个特定的结果，比如说A，当在B状态下对系统进行观测时，肯定会导致一些不同的结果,比如说B。当对处于叠加状态的系统进行观测时，会有什么结果？答案是，根据概率定律，结果有时是a，有时是b，这取决于叠加过程中a和b的相对权重。它永远不会与a和b（即a或b）不同。因此，由叠加形成的状态的中间性质通过观察的特定结果介于原始状态的相应概率之间的概率来表示，而不是通过结果本身介于原始状态的相应结果之间来表示。</blockquote >

<blockquote>“振幅叠加... ... 只有在没有办法知道，甚至在原则上，粒子走哪条路径的情况下才有效。重要的是要认识到，这并不意味着一个观察者实际上注意到发生了什么。如果路径信息原则上可以从实验中获得，或者即使它分散在环境中，超出了任何技术可能性可以恢复的范围，但原则上仍然“在那里” ，那么破坏干涉图样就足够了缺乏这样的信息是量子干涉出现的基本标准。</blockquote >

<blockquote>“振幅叠加... ... 只有在没有办法知道，甚至在原则上，粒子走哪条路径的情况下才有效。重要的是要认识到，这并不意味着一个观察者实际上注意到发生了什么。如果路径信息原则上可以从实验中获得，或者即使它分散在环境中，超出了任何技术可能性可以恢复的范围，但原则上仍然“在那里” ，那么破坏干涉图样就足够了缺乏这样的信息是量子干涉出现的基本标准。</blockquote >

==Theory理论==

==Theory理论==