更改

However,  for <math>m=1</math> it describes the winner takes it all mechanism as we find that almost <math>99\%</math> of the total nodes have degree one and one is super-rich in degree. As <math>m</math> value increases the disparity between the super rich and poor decreases and as <math>m>14</math> we find a transition from rich get super richer to rich get richer mechanism.

However,  for <math>m=1</math> it describes the winner takes it all mechanism as we find that almost <math>99\%</math> of the total nodes have degree one and one is super-rich in degree. As <math>m</math> value increases the disparity between the super rich and poor decreases and as <math>m>14</math> we find a transition from rich get super richer to rich get richer mechanism.

然而对于<math>m=1</math>，它描述了赢者通吃的机制，因为可以发现几乎<math>99\%</math> 的节点的度仅为1，而某一个节点的度超级大。当<math>m</math>的值增加时，超级富人和穷人之间的差距减小；当<math>m>14</math>时，从赢者通吃机制转变为富人更富机制。

然而，当<math>m=1</math> 时，它描述了赢者通吃的机制，因为我们可以发现，几乎<math>99\%</math> 的节点的度仅为1，而某一个节点的度超级大。当<math>m</math>的值增加时，超级富人和穷人之间的差距减小；当<math>m>14</math>时，从赢者通吃机制转变为富人更富机制。

=== 适应度模型 ===

=== 适应度模型 ===