生物符号学

来自集智百科 - 复杂系统|人工智能|复杂科学|复杂网络|自组织
跳到导航 跳到搜索

此词条暂由彩云小译翻译，翻译字数共1481，未经人工整理和审校，带来阅读不便，请见谅。

For the journal, see Biosemiotics (journal).
See also: Biocommunication (science)

模板:Semiotics Biosemiotics (from the Greek βίος bios, "life" and σημειωτικός sēmeiōtikos, "observant of signs") is a field of semiotics and biology that studies the prelinguistic meaning-making, or production and interpretation of signs and codes and their communication in the biological realm.[1]



Biosemiotics (from the Greek βίος bios, "life" and σημειωτικός sēmeiōtikos, "observant of signs") is a field of semiotics and biology that studies the prelinguistic meaning-making, or production and interpretation of signs and codes and their communication in the biological realm.Favareau, Donald (ed.) 2010. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. (Biosemiotics 3.) Berlin: Springer.

生物符号学(biosemiology，源于希腊语 βsomething bios，life)和 σημει ωκos mei tikos，即”符号的观察者”)是研究前语言意义的产生，或符号和代码的产生和解释及其在生物领域的交流的符号学和生物学领域。费瓦罗，唐纳德2010.生物符号学的基本解读: 选集与评论。(生物符号学3.)柏林: 斯普林格。

Biosemiotics integrates the findings of biology and semiotics and proposes a paradigmatic shift in the scientific view of life, in which semiosis (sign process, including meaning and interpretation) is one of its immanent and intrinsic features.[2] The term biosemiotic was first used by Friedrich S. Rothschild in 1962,[3] but Thomas Sebeok and Thure von Uexküll have implemented the term and field.[4] The field, which challenges normative views of biology, is generally divided between theoretical and applied biosemiotics.

Biosemiotics integrates the findings of biology and semiotics and proposes a paradigmatic shift in the scientific view of life, in which semiosis (sign process, including meaning and interpretation) is one of its immanent and intrinsic features. The term biosemiotic was first used by Friedrich S. Rothschild in 1962,On the early use of the term, see: Kull, Kalevi 2022. The term ‘Biosemiotik’ in the 19th century. Sign Systems Studies 50(1): 173–178. but Thomas Sebeok and Thure von Uexküll have implemented the term and field.Kull, Kalevi 1999. Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: A view from biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 385–414. The field, which challenges normative views of biology, is generally divided between theoretical and applied biosemiotics.

生物符号学综合了生物学和符号学的研究成果，提出了科学生命观的范式转换，符号过程(符号过程，包括意义和解释)是其内在和固有的特征之一。生物符号学这个术语最早由弗里德里希 · s · 罗斯柴尔德在1962年使用，关于这个术语的早期使用，参见: Kull，Kalevi 2022。19世纪的生物信息学。标志系统研究50(1) : 173-178。但 Thomas Sebeok 和 Thure von Uexküll 实施了术语和场。从生物学角度看20世纪的生物符号学。Semiotica 127(1/4) : 385-414.该领域，挑战生物学的规范观点，通常分为理论和应用生物符号学。

Insights from biosemiotics have also been adopted in the humanities and social sciences, including human-animal studies, human-plant studies[5][6] and cybersemiotics.[7]

Insights from biosemiotics have also been adopted in the humanities and social sciences, including human-animal studies, human-plant studies and cybersemiotics.

生物符号学的见解也被应用于人文和社会科学，包括人类-动物研究、人类-植物研究和控制符号学。

Definition

Biosemiotics is biology interpreted as a sign systems study, or, to elaborate, a study of

Biosemiotics is biology interpreted as a sign systems study, or, to elaborate, a study of

  • signification, communication and habit formation of living processes
  • semiosis (creating and changing sign relations) in living nature
  • the biological basis of all signs and sign interpretation

= = 定义 = = 生物符号学是生物学的解释为符号系统的研究，或者，详细说明，研究

  • 意义，沟通和生活过程的习惯形成
  • 符号的生物学基础(创造和变化的符号关系)在生活的自然
  • 所有的符号和符号解释

Main branches

According to the basic types of semiosis under study, biosemiotics can be divided into

  • vegetative semiotics (also endosemiotics, or phytosemiotics),[8] the study of semiosis at the cellular and molecular level (including the translation processes related to genome and the organic form or phenotype);[9] vegetative semiosis occurs in all organisms at their cellular and tissue level; vegetative semiotics includes prokaryote semiotics, sign-mediated interactions in bacteria communities such as quorum sensing and quorum quenching.
  • zoosemiotics or animal semiotics,[10] or the study of animal forms of knowing;[11] animal semiosis occurs in the organisms with neuromuscular system, also includes anthroposemiotics, the study of semiotic behavior in humans.

According to the basic types of semiosis under study, biosemiotics can be divided into

  • vegetative semiotics (also endosemiotics, or phytosemiotics),Witzany, G. 2006. Plant Communication from Biosemiotic Perspective.

Plant Signaling & Behavior 1(4): 169-178. the study of semiosis at the cellular and molecular level (including the translation processes related to genome and the organic form or phenotype);Kull, Kalevi 2000. An introduction to phytosemiotics: Semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems. Sign Systems Studies 28: 326–350. vegetative semiosis occurs in all organisms at their cellular and tissue level; vegetative semiotics includes prokaryote semiotics, sign-mediated interactions in bacteria communities such as quorum sensing and quorum quenching.

  • zoosemiotics or animal semiotics,Maran, Timo; Martinelli, Dario; Turovski, Aleksei (eds.), 2011. Readings in Zoosemiotics. (Semiotics, Communication and Cognition 8.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. or the study of animal forms of knowing;Kull, Kalevi 2014. Zoosemiotics is the study of animal forms of knowing. Semiotica 198: 47–60. animal semiosis occurs in the organisms with neuromuscular system, also includes anthroposemiotics, the study of semiotic behavior in humans.

= = = = 根据所研究的符号学的基本类型，生物符号学可以分为营养符号学(也称为内部符号学或植物符号学) ，Witzany，g. 2006。从生物符号学角度看植物传播。植物信号与行为1(4) : 169-178。在细胞和分子水平上的信号分裂研究(包括与基因组和有机形式或表型有关的翻译过程)。植物符号学导论: 植物符号学和营养体征系统。标志系统研究28:326-350。营养信号分裂发生在所有生物的细胞和组织水平，营养信号学包括原核生物信号学，细菌群落中的符号介导的相互作用，如群体感应和群体猝灭。

  • 动物符号学或动物符号学，Maran，Timo; Martinelli，Dario; Turovski，Aleksei (eds。), 2011.Zoosemiotics 阅读资料。(符号学，沟通与认知8)。Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.或者是对动物知觉形式的研究; Kull，Kalevi，2014。动物符号学是研究动物认知形式的学科。Semiotica 198:47-60.动物符号学发生在具有神经肌肉系统的生物体内，也包括人类活动符号学，研究人类的符号行为。

According to the dominant aspect of semiosis under study, the following labels have been used: biopragmatics, biosemantics, and biosyntactics.

According to the dominant aspect of semiosis under study, the following labels have been used: biopragmatics, biosemantics, and biosyntactics.

根据研究中的符号分裂的主要方面，使用了以下标签: 生物复合图、生物语义学和生物合成策略。

History

Apart from Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914) and Charles W. Morris (1903–1979), early pioneers of biosemiotics were Jakob von Uexküll (1864–1944), Heini Hediger (1908–1992), Giorgio Prodi (1928–1987), Marcel Florkin (1900–1979) and Friedrich S. Rothschild (1899–1995); the founding fathers of the contemporary interdiscipline were Thomas Sebeok (1920–2001) and Thure von Uexküll (1908–2004).[12]

Apart from Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914) and Charles W. Morris (1903–1979), early pioneers of biosemiotics were Jakob von Uexküll (1864–1944), Heini Hediger (1908–1992), Giorgio Prodi (1928–1987), Marcel Florkin (1900–1979) and Friedrich S. Rothschild (1899–1995); the founding fathers of the contemporary interdiscipline were Thomas Sebeok (1920–2001) and Thure von Uexküll (1908–2004).Favareau, D. (ed.) (2010). Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. Berlin: Springer.

= = 历史 = = 除了查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔士(1839-1914)和查尔斯·莫里斯(1903-1979) ，早期的生物符号学先驱是 Jakob von Uexküll (1864-1944) ，Heini Hediger (1908-1992) ，Giorgio Prodi (1928-1987) ，Marcel Florkin (1900-1979)和 Friedrich s. Rothschild(1899-1995);当代跨学科的创始人是托马斯 · 塞伯克(1920-2001)和图雷 · 冯 · 尤克斯库尔(1908-2004)。法瓦罗，d。(ed.)(2010).生物符号学的基本解读: 选集与评论。柏林: 斯普林格。

In the 1980s a circle of mathematicians active in Theoretical Biology, René Thom (Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques), Yannick Kergosien (Dalhousie University and Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques), and Robert Rosen (Dalhousie University, also a former member of the Buffalo group with Howard H. Pattee), explored the relations between Semiotics and Biology using such headings as "Nature Semiotics",[13][14] "Semiophysics",[15] or "Anticipatory Systems" [16] and taking a modeling approach.

In the 1980s a circle of mathematicians active in Theoretical Biology, René Thom (Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques), Yannick Kergosien (Dalhousie University and Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques), and Robert Rosen (Dalhousie University, also a former member of the Buffalo group with Howard H. Pattee), explored the relations between Semiotics and Biology using such headings as "Nature Semiotics",Kergosien, Y. (1985) Sémiotique de la Nature, IVe séminaire de l'Ecole d'automne de Biologie Théorique (Solignac, juin 1984), G. BENCHETRIT éd., C.N.R.S.Kergosien, Y. (1992) Nature Semiotics : The Icons of Nature. Biosemiotics : The Semiotic Web 1991, T. Sebeok et J. Umiker -Sebeok (eds), Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 145-170 "Semiophysics",Thom, R., (1989) Semio physics: a sketch. Redwood City, Calif. : Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. or "Anticipatory Systems" Rosen, R. (1985) Anticipatory systems, Pergamon Press and taking a modeling approach.

In the 1980s a circle of mathematicians active in Theoretical Biology, René Thom (Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques), Yannick Kergosien (Dalhousie University and Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques), and Robert Rosen (Dalhousie University, also a former member of the Buffalo group with Howard H. Pattee), explored the relations between Semiotics and Biology using such headings as "Nature Semiotics",Kergosien, Y.(1985) Sémiotique de la Nature, IVe séminaire de l'Ecole d'automne de Biologie Théorique (Solignac, juin 1984), G. BENCHETRIT éd., C.N.R.S.Kergosien, Y.(1992)自然符号学: 自然的象征。生物符号学: The semitic Web 1991，t. Sebeok et j. Umiker-Sebeok (eds) ，Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter，pp。145-170“半物理学”，Thom，r. ，(1989) Semio 物理学: 草图。雷德伍德城: Addison-Wesley Pub。公司或“预期系统”罗森，r。(1985)预期系统，帕加蒙出版社，并采取建模方法。

The contemporary period (as initiated by Copenhagen-Tartu school)[17] include biologists Jesper Hoffmeyer, Kalevi Kull, Claus Emmeche, Terrence Deacon, semioticians Martin Krampen, Paul Cobley, philosophers Donald Favareau, John Deely, John Collier and complex systems scientists Howard H. Pattee, Michael Conrad, Luis M. Rocha, Cliff Joslyn and León Croizat.

The contemporary period (as initiated by Copenhagen-Tartu school)See an account of recent history in: Petrilli, Susan (2011). Expression and Interpretation in Language. Transaction Publishers, pp. 85–92. include biologists Jesper Hoffmeyer, Kalevi Kull, Claus Emmeche, Terrence Deacon, semioticians Martin Krampen, Paul Cobley, philosophers Donald Favareau, John Deely, John Collier and complex systems scientists Howard H. Pattee, Michael Conrad, Luis M. Rocha, Cliff Joslyn and León Croizat.

当代时期(由哥本哈根-塔尔图学派发起)参见《近代史记》 : 佩特里利，苏珊(2011)。语言的表达与阐释。事务出版商，pp。85–92.包括生物学家 Jesper Hoffmeyer，Kalevi Kull，Claus Emmeche，Terrence Deacon，符号学家 Martin Krampen，Paul Cobley，哲学家 Donald Favareau，John Deely，John Collier 和复杂系统科学家 Howard h. Pattee，Michael Conrad，Luis m. Rocha，Cliff Joslyn 和 León Croizat。

In 2001, an annual international conference for biosemiotic research known as the Gatherings in Biosemiotics[18] was inaugurated, and has taken place every year since.

In 2001, an annual international conference for biosemiotic research known as the Gatherings in BiosemioticsRattasepp, Silver; Bennett, Tyler (eds.) 2012. Gatherings in Biosemiotics. (Tartu Semiotics Library 11.) Tartu: University of Tartu Press. was inaugurated, and has taken place every year since.

2001年，一年一度的生物符号学研究国际会议，被称为生物符号学会议2012.在 Biosemiotics 举行的聚会。(Tartu Semiotics Library 11.)塔尔图: 塔尔图大学出版社。从那以后每年都举行。

In 2004, a group of biosemioticians – Marcello Barbieri, Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer, Kalevi Kull, and Anton Markos – decided to establish an international journal of biosemiotics. Under their editorship, the Journal of Biosemiotics was launched by Nova Science Publishers in 2005 (two issues published), and with the same five editors Biosemiotics was launched by Springer in 2008. The book series Biosemiotics (Springer), edited by Claus Emmeche, Donald Favareau, Kalevi Kull, and Alexei Sharov, began in 2007 and since published 23 volumes.

In 2004, a group of biosemioticians – Marcello Barbieri, Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer, Kalevi Kull, and Anton Markos – decided to establish an international journal of biosemiotics. Under their editorship, the Journal of Biosemiotics was launched by Nova Science Publishers in 2005 (two issues published), and with the same five editors Biosemiotics was launched by Springer in 2008. The book series Biosemiotics (Springer), edited by Claus Emmeche, Donald Favareau, Kalevi Kull, and Alexei Sharov, began in 2007 and since published 23 volumes.

2004年，一群生物符号学家—— Marcello Barbieri、 Claus Emmeche、 Jesper Hoffmeyer、 Kalevi Kull 和 Anton Markos ——决定创办一本国际生物符号学杂志。在他们的编辑工作下，《生物符号学杂志》于2005年由新星科学出版社(Nova Science Publishers)出版(出版了两期) ，与同样的五位编辑一起，《生物符号学》于2008年由斯普林格出版社出版。由克劳斯 · 埃米切(Claus Emmeche)、唐纳德 · 法瓦罗(Donald favarau)、卡莱维 · 库尔(Kalevi Kull)和阿列克谢 · 沙罗夫(Alexei Sharov)编辑的系列丛书《生物符号学》(Biosemiotics，Springer)于2007年开始出版，此后共出版了23卷。

The International Society for Biosemiotic Studies was established in 2005 by Donald Favareau and the five editors listed above.[19] A collective programmatic paper on the basic theses of biosemiotics appeared in 2009.[20] and in 2010, an 800 page textbook and anthology, Essential Readings in Biosemiotics, was published, with bibliographies and commentary by Donald Favareau.[1]

The International Society for Biosemiotic Studies was established in 2005 by Donald Favareau and the five editors listed above.Favareau, Donald 2005. Founding a world biosemiotics institution: The International Society for Biosemiotic Studies. Sign Systems Studies 33(2): 481–485. A collective programmatic paper on the basic theses of biosemiotics appeared in 2009.Kull, Kalevi; Deacon, Terrence; Emmeche, Claus; Hoffmeyer, Jesper; Stjernfelt, Frederik 2009. Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory 4(2): 167–173, and in 2010, an 800 page textbook and anthology, Essential Readings in Biosemiotics, was published, with bibliographies and commentary by Donald Favareau.

国际生物符号学研究学会由唐纳德 · 法瓦罗和上述五位编辑于2005年创立。2005.建立世界生物符号学机构: 国际生物符号学研究学会。标志系统研究33(2) : 481-485。2009年出版了一份关于生物符号学基本论题的集体纲领性论文。卡列维; 迪肯，泰伦斯; 埃米切，克劳斯; 霍夫梅耶，杰斯珀; Stjernfelt，弗雷德里克2009。生物符号学论文: 一门理论生物学的序言。生物学理论4(2) : 167-173,2010年，一本800页的教科书和选集《 Biosemiotics 基本阅读》出版，其中有唐纳德 · 法瓦罗的书目和评论。

In the humanities

Since the work of Jakob von Uexküll and Martin Heidegger, several scholars in the humanities have engaged with or appropriated ideas from biosemiotics in their own projects; conversely, biosemioticians have critically engaged with or reformulated humanistic theories using ideas from biosemiotics and complexity theory. For instance, Andreas Weber has reformulated some of Hans Jonas's ideas using concepts from biosemiotics,[21] and biosemiotics have been used to interpret the poetry of John Burnside.[22]

Since the work of Jakob von Uexküll and Martin Heidegger, several scholars in the humanities have engaged with or appropriated ideas from biosemiotics in their own projects; conversely, biosemioticians have critically engaged with or reformulated humanistic theories using ideas from biosemiotics and complexity theory. For instance, Andreas Weber has reformulated some of Hans Jonas's ideas using concepts from biosemiotics, and biosemiotics have been used to interpret the poetry of John Burnside.

自从 Jakob von Uexküll 和马丁·海德格尔的工作以来，一些人文学科的学者在他们自己的项目中参与或借鉴了生物符号学的思想; 反过来，生物符号学家用生物符号学和复杂性理论的思想批判性地参与或重新阐述了人文主义理论。例如，安德烈亚斯 · 韦伯用生物符号学的概念重新阐述了汉斯 · 乔纳斯的一些观点，生物符号学也被用来解释约翰 · 伯恩赛德的诗歌。

In 2021, the American philosopher Jason Josephson Storm has drawn on biosemiotics and empirical research on animal communication to propose hylosemiotics, a theory of ontology and communication that Storm believes could allow the humanities to move beyond the linguistic turn.[23]

In 2021, the American philosopher Jason Josephson Storm has drawn on biosemiotics and empirical research on animal communication to propose hylosemiotics, a theory of ontology and communication that Storm believes could allow the humanities to move beyond the linguistic turn.

2021年，美国哲学家 Jason Josephson Storm 利用生物符号学和动物交流实证研究，提出了符号学---- 一种本体论和交流理论，Storm 认为这种理论可以使人文学科超越语言学的转向。

John Deely's work also represents an engagement between humanistic and biosemiotic approaches. Deely was trained as a historian and not a biologist but discussed biosemiotics and zoosemiotics extensively in his introductory works on semiotics and clarified terms that are relevant for biosemiotics.[24] Although his idea of physiosemiotics was criticized by practicing biosemioticians, Paul Cobley, Donald Favareau, and Kalevi Kull wrote that "the debates on this conceptual point between Deely and the biosemiotics community were always civil and marked by a mutual admiration for the contributions of the other towards the advancement of our understanding of sign relations."[25]

John Deely's work also represents an engagement between humanistic and biosemiotic approaches. Deely was trained as a historian and not a biologist but discussed biosemiotics and zoosemiotics extensively in his introductory works on semiotics and clarified terms that are relevant for biosemiotics. Although his idea of physiosemiotics was criticized by practicing biosemioticians, Paul Cobley, Donald Favareau, and Kalevi Kull wrote that "the debates on this conceptual point between Deely and the biosemiotics community were always civil and marked by a mutual admiration for the contributions of the other towards the advancement of our understanding of sign relations."

约翰迪利的工作也代表了人文主义和生物符号学方法之间的接触。德利是一位历史学家，而不是生物学家，但他在其关于符号学的介绍性著作中广泛地讨论了生物符号学和动物符号学，并澄清了与生物符号学相关的术语。虽然他的生理符号学思想受到了生物符号学家的批评，但是 Paul Cobley，Donald favarau 和 Kalevi Kull 写道，“ Deely 和生物符号学界关于这个概念点的辩论总是文明的，并且互相钦佩对方对推进我们对符号关系的理解的贡献。”

See also

模板:Col div


  • Animal communication
  • Biocommunication (science)
  • Cognitive biology
  • Ecosemiotics
  • Mimicry
  • Naturalization of intentionality
  • Zoosemiotics
  • Plant communication


= 参见 =

  • 动物交流
  • 生物交流(科学)
  • 认知生物学
  • 生态符号学
  • 模仿意向的归化
  • 动物符号学
  • 植物交流

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Favareau, Donald (ed.) 2010. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. (Biosemiotics 3.) Berlin: Springer.
  2. ↑ Alexandrov, Vladimir E. (2000). "Biology, Semiosis, and Cultural Difference in Lotman's Semiosphere". Comparative Literature. 52 (4): 339–362. doi:10.2307/1771352. JSTOR 1771352. Retrieved 11 May 2021. 'Biosemiotics.' This discipline focuses on the manifold possible connections between biology and semiotics, such as studying biological processes from a semiotic perspective and communication from a biological perspective, or searching for a way to theorize biological phenomena (Laubichler 'Introduction').
  3. ↑ On the early use of the term, see: Kull, Kalevi 2022. The term ‘Biosemiotik’ in the 19th century. Sign Systems Studies 50(1): 173–178.
  4. ↑ Kull, Kalevi 1999. Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: A view from biology. Semiotica 127(1/4): 385–414.
  5. ↑ Brentari, Carlo (2018-12-01). "From the Hiatus Model to the Diffuse Discontinuities: A Turning Point in Human-Animal Studies". Biosemiotics. 11 (3): 331–345. doi:10.1007/s12304-018-9329-8. ISSN 1875-1350. S2CID 49478848. Retrieved 2022-01-05.
  6. ↑ Ryan, John Charles (2012). "Passive Flora? Reconsidering Nature's Agency through Human-Plant Studies (HPS)". Societies. 2 (3): 101–121. doi:10.3390/soc2030101.
  7. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (2019). "Can Computers Create Meanings? A Cyber/Bio/Semiotic Perspective". Critical Inquiry (in English). 46 (1): 32–55. doi:10.1086/705303. ISSN 0093-1896.
  8. ↑ Witzany, G. 2006. Plant Communication from Biosemiotic Perspective. Plant Signaling & Behavior 1(4): 169-178.
  9. ↑ Kull, Kalevi 2000. An introduction to phytosemiotics: Semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems. Sign Systems Studies 28: 326–350.
  10. ↑ Maran, Timo; Martinelli, Dario; Turovski, Aleksei (eds.), 2011. Readings in Zoosemiotics. (Semiotics, Communication and Cognition 8.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  11. ↑ Kull, Kalevi 2014. Zoosemiotics is the study of animal forms of knowing. Semiotica 198: 47–60.
  12. ↑ Favareau, D. (ed.) (2010). Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. Berlin: Springer.
  13. ↑ Kergosien, Y. (1985) Sémiotique de la Nature, IVe séminaire de l'Ecole d'automne de Biologie Théorique (Solignac, juin 1984), G. BENCHETRIT éd., C.N.R.S.
  14. ↑ Kergosien, Y. (1992) Nature Semiotics : The Icons of Nature. Biosemiotics : The Semiotic Web 1991, T. Sebeok et J. Umiker -Sebeok (eds), Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 145-170
  15. ↑ Thom, R., (1989) Semio physics: a sketch. Redwood City, Calif. : Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
  16. ↑ Rosen, R. (1985) Anticipatory systems, Pergamon Press
  17. ↑ See an account of recent history in: Petrilli, Susan (2011). Expression and Interpretation in Language. Transaction Publishers, pp. 85–92.
  18. ↑ Rattasepp, Silver; Bennett, Tyler (eds.) 2012. Gatherings in Biosemiotics. (Tartu Semiotics Library 11.) Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
  19. ↑ Favareau, Donald 2005. Founding a world biosemiotics institution: The International Society for Biosemiotic Studies. Sign Systems Studies 33(2): 481–485.
  20. ↑ Kull, Kalevi; Deacon, Terrence; Emmeche, Claus; Hoffmeyer, Jesper; Stjernfelt, Frederik 2009. Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory 4(2): 167–173,
  21. ↑ Tønnessen, Morten; Maran, Timo; Sharov, Alexei (2018-12-01). "Phenomenology and Biosemiotics". Biosemiotics. 11 (3): 324. doi:10.1007/s12304-018-9345-8. ISSN 1875-1350. S2CID 54020391. Retrieved 2022-01-05.
  22. ↑ Bristow, Tom (2010). "Phenomenology, History, Biosemiosis: Heideggerian and Batesonian Poetics in John Burnside's Post-Romantic Process Ecology". Green Letters. 13 (1): 74–94. doi:10.1080/14688417.2010.10589071. ISSN 1468-8417. S2CID 171037754. Retrieved 2022-01-05.
  23. ↑ Storm, Jason Ananda Josephson (2021). Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 152. ISBN 978-0-226-78665-0. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Metamodernism/pEQ6EAAAQBAJ. 
  24. ↑ Cobley, Paul; Favareau, Donald; Kull, Kalevi (2017). "John Deely, from the point of view of Biosemiotics". Biosemiotics. 10: 2–3. doi:10.1007/s12304-017-9291-x. S2CID 41549373.
  25. ↑ Cobley, Paul; Favareau, Donald; Kull, Kalevi (2017). "John Deely, from the point of view of Biosemiotics". Biosemiotics. 10: 3. doi:10.1007/s12304-017-9291-x. S2CID 41549373.

Bibliography

  • Alexander, V. N. (2011). The Biologist’s Mistress: Rethinking Self-Organization in Art, Literature and Nature. Litchfield Park AZ: Emergent Publications.
  • Barbieri, Marcello (ed.) (2008). The Codes of Life: The Rules of Macroevolution. Berlin: Springer.
  • Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi (eds.) (2011). Towards a Semiotic Biology: Life is the Action of Signs. London: Imperial College Press.[1]
  • Emmeche, Claus; Kalevi Kull and Frederik Stjernfelt. (2002): Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. (Tartu Semiotics Library 3). Tartu: Tartu University Press.[2]
  • Favareau, D. (ed.) (2010). Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. Berlin: Springer.
  • Favareau, D. (2006). The evolutionary history of biosemiotics. In "Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis." Marcello Barbieri (Ed.) Berlin: Springer. pp 1–67.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (1996): Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (special issue of Semiotica vol. 120 (no.3-4), 1998, includes 13 reviews of the book and a rejoinder by the author).
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2008). Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (ed.)(2008). A Legacy for Living Systems: Gregory Bateson as a Precursor to Biosemiotics. Berlin: Springer.
  • Hoffmeyer Jesper; Kull, Kalevi (2003): Baldwin and Biosemiotics: What Intelligence Is For. In: Bruce H. Weber and David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning - The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered'. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Kull, Kalevi, eds. (2001). Jakob von Uexküll: A Paradigm for Biology and Semiotics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [ = Semiotica vol. 134 (no.1-4)].
  • Rothschild, Friedrich S. (2000). Creation and Evolution: A Biosemiotic Approach. Edison, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  • Sebeok, Thomas A.; Umiker-Sebeok, Jean (eds.) (1992): Biosemiotics. The Semiotic Web 1991. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Sebeok, Thomas A.; Hoffmeyer, Jesper; Emmeche, Claus (eds.) (1999). Biosemiotica. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [ = Semiotica vol. 127 (no.1-4)].
  • Tønnessen, Morten; Maran, Timo; Sharov, Alexei (2018). "Phenomenology and Biosemiotics". Biosemiotics. 11 (3): 323–330. doi:10.1007/s12304-018-9345-8. ISSN 1875-1350. S2CID 54020391.


  • Alexander, V. N. (2011). The Biologist’s Mistress: Rethinking Self-Organization in Art, Literature and Nature. Litchfield Park AZ: Emergent Publications.
  • Barbieri, Marcello (ed.) (2008). The Codes of Life: The Rules of Macroevolution. Berlin: Springer.
  • Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi (eds.) (2011). Towards a Semiotic Biology: Life is the Action of Signs. London: Imperial College Press.
  • Emmeche, Claus; Kalevi Kull and Frederik Stjernfelt. (2002): Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. (Tartu Semiotics Library 3). Tartu: Tartu University Press.
  • Favareau, D. (ed.) (2010). Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. Berlin: Springer.
  • Favareau, D. (2006). The evolutionary history of biosemiotics. In "Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis." Marcello Barbieri (Ed.) Berlin: Springer. pp 1–67.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. (1996): Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (special issue of Semiotica vol. 120 (no.3-4), 1998, includes 13 reviews of the book and a rejoinder by the author).
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2008). Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (ed.)(2008). A Legacy for Living Systems: Gregory Bateson as a Precursor to Biosemiotics. Berlin: Springer.
  • Hoffmeyer Jesper; Kull, Kalevi (2003): Baldwin and Biosemiotics: What Intelligence Is For. In: Bruce H. Weber and David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning - The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered'. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Kull, Kalevi, eds. (2001). Jakob von Uexküll: A Paradigm for Biology and Semiotics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [ = Semiotica vol. 134 (no.1-4)].
  • Rothschild, Friedrich S. (2000). Creation and Evolution: A Biosemiotic Approach. Edison, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  • Sebeok, Thomas A.; Umiker-Sebeok, Jean (eds.) (1992): Biosemiotics. The Semiotic Web 1991. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Sebeok, Thomas A.; Hoffmeyer, Jesper; Emmeche, Claus (eds.) (1999). Biosemiotica. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [ = Semiotica vol. 127 (no.1-4)].

Bibliography

  • Alexander, V. N. (2011).生物学家的情妇: 重新思考艺术、文学和自然中的自我组织。利奇菲尔德帕克出版社: Emergent Publications。
  • Barbieri，Marcello (ed.)(2008).生命的密码: 宏观进化的规则。柏林: 斯普林格。
  • Emmeche, Claus; Kull, Kalevi (eds.)(2011).走向符号生物学: 生命是符号的行动。伦敦帝国理工学院出版社。
  • Emmeche，Claus; Kalevi Kull 和 Frederik Stjernfelt。(2002) : 阅读 Hoffmeyer，《反思生物学》。(Tartu Semiotics Library 3).塔尔图: 塔尔图大学出版社。
  • Favareau，d.(ed.)(2010).生物符号学的基本解读: 选集与评论。柏林: 斯普林格。
  • Favareau，d. (2006).生物符号学的进化史。在“生物符号学导论: 新的生物合成”中Marcello Barbieri (编辑)柏林: 斯普林格。Pp 1-67.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper.(1996) : 宇宙的意义符号。布卢明顿: 印第安纳大学出版社。(Semiotica 特刊第一卷)。1998年出版的《120》(第3-4号)包括13篇书评和一篇作者的反驳。
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2008).生物符号学: 生命迹象与生命迹象的审视。斯克兰顿: 斯克兰顿大学出版社。
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper (ed.)(2008).生命系统的遗产: 格雷戈里 · 贝特森: 生物符号学的先驱。柏林: 斯普林格。
  • Hoffmeyer Jesper; Kull，Kalevi (2003) : Baldwin and biosemiology: What Intelligence Is For.年: 布鲁斯 · 韦伯和大卫 · j · 迪普。) ，进化和学习-鲍德温效应重新考虑’。剑桥: 麻省理工学院出版社。
  • Kull，Kalevi，eds.(2001).Jakob von Uexküll: 生物学和符号学的范式。柏林和纽约: Mouton de Gruyter。[ = Semiotica vol.134(编号1-4)]。
  • 罗斯柴尔德、弗里德里希• s •(2000)。创造与进化: 生物符号学方法。新泽西州爱迪生: 交易出版商。
  • 塞伯克(Thomas a.) ; 乌米克-塞伯克(umiker-Sebeok) ，简(eds.)(1992) : 生物符号学。1991.柏林和纽约: 木桐德格鲁伊特。
  • Sebeok, Thomas A.; Hoffmeyer, Jesper; Emmeche, Claus (eds.)(1999).生物信息学。柏林和纽约: Mouton de Gruyter。[ = Semiotica vol.127(编号1-4)]。

External links

  • International Society for Biosemiotics Studies, (older version)
  • New Scientist article on Biosemiotics
  • The Biosemiotics website by Alexei Sharov
  • Biosemiotics, introduction (Archive.org archived version)
  • Overview of Gatherings in Biosemiotics
  • The S.E.E.D. Journal (Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development)
  • Jakob von Uexküll Centre
  • Zoosemiotics Home Page

= = 外部链接 = =

  • 国际生物符号学研究学会，(旧版本)
  • 《新科学家》关于生物符号学的文章
  • 《生物符号学》网站，作者 Alexei Sharov
  • 《生物符号学》 ，导言(archive. org 存档版本)
  • 《生物符号学聚会概览》
  • 。杂志(符号学，进化，能量和发展)
  • Jakob von Uexküll Centre
  • Zoosemiotics Home Page

模板:Branches of biology

Category:Biology Category:Plant cognition Category:Plant communication Category:Semiotics Category:Zoosemiotics

范畴: 生物学范畴: 植物认知范畴: 植物通讯范畴: 符号学范畴: 动物符号学


This page was moved from wikipedia:en:Biosemiotics. Its edit history can be viewed at 生物符号学/edithistory

取自“https://wiki.swarma.org/index.php?title=生物符号学&oldid=31920”