更改

跳到导航 跳到搜索
添加163字节 、 2020年11月5日 (四) 20:51
第452行: 第452行:  
The [[Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations]], or "HHL Algorithm", named after its discoverers Harrow, Hassidim, and Lloyd, is expected to provide speedup over classical counterparts.<ref name="Quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations by Harrow et al.">{{Cite journal |arxiv = 0811.3171|last1 = Harrow|first1 = Aram|last2 = Hassidim|first2 = Avinatan|last3 = Lloyd|first3 = Seth|title = Quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations|journal = Physical Review Letters|volume = 103|issue = 15|pages = 150502|year = 2009|doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502|pmid = 19905613|bibcode = 2009PhRvL.103o0502H|s2cid = 5187993}}</ref>
 
The [[Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations]], or "HHL Algorithm", named after its discoverers Harrow, Hassidim, and Lloyd, is expected to provide speedup over classical counterparts.<ref name="Quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations by Harrow et al.">{{Cite journal |arxiv = 0811.3171|last1 = Harrow|first1 = Aram|last2 = Hassidim|first2 = Avinatan|last3 = Lloyd|first3 = Seth|title = Quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations|journal = Physical Review Letters|volume = 103|issue = 15|pages = 150502|year = 2009|doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502|pmid = 19905613|bibcode = 2009PhRvL.103o0502H|s2cid = 5187993}}</ref>
   −
 
+
以其发现者哈罗、哈西迪姆和劳埃德命名的[[用于线性方程组的量子算法]]或“HHL算法”,有望提供比经典算法更快的速度。
    
John Preskill has introduced the term quantum supremacy to refer to the hypothetical speedup advantage that a quantum computer would have over a classical computer in a certain field. Google announced in 2017 that it expected to achieve quantum supremacy by the end of the year though that did not happen. IBM said in 2018 that the best classical computers will be beaten on some practical task within about five years and views the quantum supremacy test only as a potential future benchmark. Although skeptics like Gil Kalai doubt that quantum supremacy will ever be achieved, in October 2019, a Sycamore processor created in conjunction with Google AI Quantum was reported to have achieved quantum supremacy, with calculations more than 3,000,000 times as fast as those of Summit, generally considered the world's fastest computer. Bill Unruh doubted the practicality of quantum computers in a paper published back in 1994. Paul Davies argued that a 400-qubit computer would even come into conflict with the cosmological information bound implied by the holographic principle.
 
John Preskill has introduced the term quantum supremacy to refer to the hypothetical speedup advantage that a quantum computer would have over a classical computer in a certain field. Google announced in 2017 that it expected to achieve quantum supremacy by the end of the year though that did not happen. IBM said in 2018 that the best classical computers will be beaten on some practical task within about five years and views the quantum supremacy test only as a potential future benchmark. Although skeptics like Gil Kalai doubt that quantum supremacy will ever be achieved, in October 2019, a Sycamore processor created in conjunction with Google AI Quantum was reported to have achieved quantum supremacy, with calculations more than 3,000,000 times as fast as those of Summit, generally considered the world's fastest computer. Bill Unruh doubted the practicality of quantum computers in a paper published back in 1994. Paul Davies argued that a 400-qubit computer would even come into conflict with the cosmological information bound implied by the holographic principle.
561

个编辑

导航菜单