更改

跳到导航 跳到搜索
添加905字节 、 2020年12月16日 (三) 21:18
第327行: 第327行:     
[[File:Phylogenic Tree-en.svg|upright=1.65|thumb|A [[cladistics|cladogram]] demonstrating extreme [[hyperthermophile]]s as occur in volcanic hot springs at the base of the [[Phylogenetic tree|phylogenetic tree of life 甲分支图表明极端超嗜热处的基部作为发生在火山温泉寿命的系统发生树。]]]]
 
[[File:Phylogenic Tree-en.svg|upright=1.65|thumb|A [[cladistics|cladogram]] demonstrating extreme [[hyperthermophile]]s as occur in volcanic hot springs at the base of the [[Phylogenetic tree|phylogenetic tree of life 甲分支图表明极端超嗜热处的基部作为发生在火山温泉寿命的系统发生树。]]]]
        第335行: 第334行:  
The most commonly accepted location of the root of the tree of life is between a monophyletic domain Bacteria and a clade formed by Archaea and Eukaryota of what is referred to as the "traditional tree of life" based on several molecular studies starting with Carl Woese.
 
The most commonly accepted location of the root of the tree of life is between a monophyletic domain Bacteria and a clade formed by Archaea and Eukaryota of what is referred to as the "traditional tree of life" based on several molecular studies starting with Carl Woese.
   −
生命树的根部最普遍接受的位置是在一元细菌域和古细菌和真核生物形成的分支之间,根据从卡尔·沃斯Carl Woese开始的一些分子研究,这被称为“传统生命树” 。
+
根据从 卡尔·沃斯Carl Woese 开始的一些分子研究,,对于生命树的根部的位置,最普遍接受的观点是位于''一元细菌域和古细菌''和''真核生物''形成的分支之间,这被称为“传统生命树”。<ref>{{cite book |editor1-first=David R. |editor1-last=Boone |editor2-first=Richard W. |editor2-last=Castenholz |editor3-first=George M. |editor3-last=Garrity |title=The ''Archaea'' and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic ''Bacteria'' |series=Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology |isbn=978-0-387-21609-6 |url=https://www.springer.com/life+sciences/microbiology/book/978-0-387-98771-2 |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141225112809/http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/microbiology/book/978-0-387-98771-2 |archivedate=25 December 2014|publisher=Springer |year=2001 }}{{page needed|date=June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Woese CR, Fox GE |title= Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. |journal= Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A |volume=74|pages= 5088–5090 |year=1977 |issue= 11 |pmid=270744 |pmc=432104|doi=10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088|bibcode= 1977PNAS...74.5088W }}</ref>
 +
 
    
A very small minority of studies have concluded differently, namely that the root is in the domain Bacteria, either in the phylum Firmicutes or’’’<font color=’’#32CD32’’> that the phylum Chloroflexi is basal to a clade with Archaea+Eukaryotes and the rest of Bacteria as proposed by Thomas Cavalier-Smith. </font>’’’More recently, Peter Ward has proposed an alternative view which is rooted in abiotic RNA synthesis which becomes enclosed within a capsule and then creates RNA ribozyme replicates. It is proposed that this then bifurcates between Dominion Ribosa (RNA life), and after the loss of ribozymes RNA viruses as Domain Viorea, and Dominion Terroa, which after creating a large cell within a lipid wall, creating DNA the 20 based amino acids and the triplet code, is established as the last universal common ancestor or LUCA, of earlier phylogenic trees.
 
A very small minority of studies have concluded differently, namely that the root is in the domain Bacteria, either in the phylum Firmicutes or’’’<font color=’’#32CD32’’> that the phylum Chloroflexi is basal to a clade with Archaea+Eukaryotes and the rest of Bacteria as proposed by Thomas Cavalier-Smith. </font>’’’More recently, Peter Ward has proposed an alternative view which is rooted in abiotic RNA synthesis which becomes enclosed within a capsule and then creates RNA ribozyme replicates. It is proposed that this then bifurcates between Dominion Ribosa (RNA life), and after the loss of ribozymes RNA viruses as Domain Viorea, and Dominion Terroa, which after creating a large cell within a lipid wall, creating DNA the 20 based amino acids and the triplet code, is established as the last universal common ancestor or LUCA, of earlier phylogenic trees.
   −
很少有研究得出了不同的结论,即根要么是在细菌域,或者要么在门厚壁菌,’’’<font color=’’#32CD32’’>或者是在汤玛斯·卡弗利尔-史密斯Thomas Cavalier-Smith所提出的氯化物门与古细菌 + 真核生物的一个分支和其余的细菌基为一个门类。</font>’’’最近,彼得 · 沃德Peter Ward提出了另一种观点,这种观点植根于非生物的 RNA 合成,这种合成被包裹在一个胶囊中,然后产生 RNA 核糖体复制。有人提出,这然后在自治核糖体(RNA生命)之间分岔,在失去核酶RNA病毒作为Dominion Viorea,和Dominion Terroa之后,在脂质壁内创造一个大细胞,创造DNA的20个基于氨基酸和三联密码,被确立为早期系统发育树的最后一个普遍共同祖先或LUCA。
+
有一小部分研究得出了不同的结论,亦即生命树的根部的位置根也许是在细菌域,要么在门厚壁菌,要么是在 托马斯·卡弗利尔-史密斯Thomas Cavalier-Smith 所提出的氯化物门与''古细菌+真核生物''的一个分支和其余的细菌为基础的一个门类。最近,彼得 · 沃德Peter Ward 提出了另一种以非生物的 RNA 合成为基础的观点。这种合成被包裹在一个胶囊中,然后产生 RNA 核糖体。有人提出,这然后在自治核糖体(RNA生命)之间分岔,在失去核酶RNA病毒作为Dominion Viorea,和Dominion Terroa之后,在脂质壁内创造一个大细胞,创造DNA的20个基于氨基酸和三联密码,被确立为早期系统发育树的最后一个普遍共同祖先或LUCA。
 
  −
| volume = 63
     −
| pages=193–231
      
In 2016, a set of 355 genes likely present in the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) of all organisms living on Earth was identified. A total of 6.1 million prokaryotic protein coding genes from various phylogenic trees were sequenced, identifying 355 protein clusters from amongst 286,514 protein clusters that were probably common to LUCA. The results  
 
In 2016, a set of 355 genes likely present in the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) of all organisms living on Earth was identified. A total of 6.1 million prokaryotic protein coding genes from various phylogenic trees were sequenced, identifying 355 protein clusters from amongst 286,514 protein clusters that were probably common to LUCA. The results  
370

个编辑

导航菜单