第114行: |
第114行: |
| 涨落耗散定理将二者联系起来,建立了“温度”、“熵”、“自由势/能”以及其他物理概念与经济系统的具体对应关系。统计力学模型不是先验构建的,它是有限理性假设和现有新古典主义模型建模的结果。在一个新古典主义模型不能预测合谋的案例中,它被用来证明'''<font color="#ff8000">休·迪克森 Huw Dixon</font>'''的“合谋的必然性”结果。 | | 涨落耗散定理将二者联系起来,建立了“温度”、“熵”、“自由势/能”以及其他物理概念与经济系统的具体对应关系。统计力学模型不是先验构建的,它是有限理性假设和现有新古典主义模型建模的结果。在一个新古典主义模型不能预测合谋的案例中,它被用来证明'''<font color="#ff8000">休·迪克森 Huw Dixon</font>'''的“合谋的必然性”结果。 |
| | | |
− | Here the demand is increasing, as with [[Veblen good]]s or stock buyers with the [[Hot-hand fallacy#Consumers|"hot hand"]] fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.<ref name="Johnson2005"> | + | Here the demand is increasing, as with [[Veblen good]]s or stock buyers with the [[Hot-hand fallacy#Consumers|"hot hand"]] fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful.<ref name="Johnson2005">{{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Joseph|author2=Tellis, G.J. |author3=Macinnis, D.J. |s2cid=145211986|title=Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=2005|volume=2|issue=32|pages=324–329|doi=10.1086/432241}}</ref> |
| Here the demand is increasing, as with Veblen goods or stock buyers with the "hot hand" fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful. | | Here the demand is increasing, as with Veblen goods or stock buyers with the "hot hand" fallacy preferring to buy more successful stocks and sell those that are less successful. |
| | | |
| 这里的需求正在增加,就像'''<font color="#ff8000">韦伯伦商品 Veblen good</font>''' 或有'''<font color="#ff8000">短期持续性 Hot Hand</font>'''谬论的股票买家,他们更愿意买入更多成功的股票,卖出那些不那么成功的股票。 | | 这里的需求正在增加,就像'''<font color="#ff8000">韦伯伦商品 Veblen good</font>''' 或有'''<font color="#ff8000">短期持续性 Hot Hand</font>'''谬论的股票买家,他们更愿意买入更多成功的股票,卖出那些不那么成功的股票。 |
| | | |
− | {{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Joseph|author2=Tellis, G.J. |author3=Macinnis, D.J. |s2cid=145211986|title=Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=2005|volume=2|issue=32|pages=324–329|doi=10.1086/432241}}</ref>
| |
| | | |
| Vernon L. Smith used these techniques to model sociability in economics. There, a model correctly predicts that agents are averse to resentment and punishment, and that there is an asymmetry between gratitude/reward and resentment/punishment. The classical Nash equilibrium is shown to have no predictive power for that model, and the Gibbs equilibrium must be used to predict phenomena outlined in Humanomics. | | Vernon L. Smith used these techniques to model sociability in economics. There, a model correctly predicts that agents are averse to resentment and punishment, and that there is an asymmetry between gratitude/reward and resentment/punishment. The classical Nash equilibrium is shown to have no predictive power for that model, and the Gibbs equilibrium must be used to predict phenomena outlined in Humanomics. |