更改

第49行: 第49行:     
“So, in AI, people talk about this notion of distribution, which is kind of a statistics idea that your data has a certain distribution. The dogs in your training data have a certain range of features that your system learns and if you show it a new thing that is within that range of features then it can recognize it, but if it's outside of that distribution, it won't be able to transfer its knowledge to that. And that's something that we humans are able to do. One of the things that kind of surprised me: there's a huge focus in AI on this thing called 'transfer learning,' which is exactly what we're talking about. That is: learn one thing, learn to play chess, be able to transfer your knowledge to variations of chess or to checkers.”
 
“So, in AI, people talk about this notion of distribution, which is kind of a statistics idea that your data has a certain distribution. The dogs in your training data have a certain range of features that your system learns and if you show it a new thing that is within that range of features then it can recognize it, but if it's outside of that distribution, it won't be able to transfer its knowledge to that. And that's something that we humans are able to do. One of the things that kind of surprised me: there's a huge focus in AI on this thing called 'transfer learning,' which is exactly what we're talking about. That is: learn one thing, learn to play chess, be able to transfer your knowledge to variations of chess or to checkers.”
  −
   
她觉得人类和人工智能的区别在于人类可以“迁移学习Transfer Learning”,比如辨认出动画片中的狗,但是如果机器的训练集当中没有动画片中的狗,它就不能很好地对这个图做出分类。而人工智能无法把知识迁移到自己从未见过的范围内。
 
她觉得人类和人工智能的区别在于人类可以“迁移学习Transfer Learning”,比如辨认出动画片中的狗,但是如果机器的训练集当中没有动画片中的狗,它就不能很好地对这个图做出分类。而人工智能无法把知识迁移到自己从未见过的范围内。
   第56行: 第54行:  
“'Intelligence' is one of those words that means different things in different contexts. (It means different things to different people. Here we are sitting in Washington, DC, and I think a lot of the country, a lot of people in the country think, 'Oh, Congress--there there's no intelligence there.' But, when I go around giving talks about AI and I say, 'Well, computers aren't very intelligent yet,' people tell me, 'Well, human beings aren't very intelligent, either.' But they're using the term just very differently. Intelligence isn't just one thing. )It's not a yes or no thing either. And I think one of the problems is we don't have a good sense of what intelligence is. We don't understand our own intelligence very well. Our state of understanding the brain is still quite limited. Our understanding of human psychology is still rather limited. And I think intelligence is the one of those terms that's a placeholder for things we don't understand yet. It's kind of a phenomenon that we kind of have a general idea of what it is but we don't know specifically, and it's just waiting for more scientific advances to replace it with something more useful.”
 
“'Intelligence' is one of those words that means different things in different contexts. (It means different things to different people. Here we are sitting in Washington, DC, and I think a lot of the country, a lot of people in the country think, 'Oh, Congress--there there's no intelligence there.' But, when I go around giving talks about AI and I say, 'Well, computers aren't very intelligent yet,' people tell me, 'Well, human beings aren't very intelligent, either.' But they're using the term just very differently. Intelligence isn't just one thing. )It's not a yes or no thing either. And I think one of the problems is we don't have a good sense of what intelligence is. We don't understand our own intelligence very well. Our state of understanding the brain is still quite limited. Our understanding of human psychology is still rather limited. And I think intelligence is the one of those terms that's a placeholder for things we don't understand yet. It's kind of a phenomenon that we kind of have a general idea of what it is but we don't know specifically, and it's just waiting for more scientific advances to replace it with something more useful.”
 
“智慧”根据语境会有不同的含义。梅拉妮·米歇尔觉得人类不太了解自己的智慧,对智慧是什么,大脑的工作方式是怎样的没有很好的认识。但人类对于“智慧”有一个大致的概念。
 
“智慧”根据语境会有不同的含义。梅拉妮·米歇尔觉得人类不太了解自己的智慧,对智慧是什么,大脑的工作方式是怎样的没有很好的认识。但人类对于“智慧”有一个大致的概念。
      
==代表作品==
 
==代表作品==
7,129

个编辑