更改

删除176字节 、 2020年12月12日 (六) 16:06
第1,068行: 第1,068行:     
大卫·夸曼David Quammen写下了他的观点,“达尔文转向了这些神秘的植物学研究–出版了多本经过实证研究的,谨慎的进化论书,却“极其令人生厌”–但是至少在某种程度上,让那些为争夺猿猴,天使和灵魂而战的吵闹争论者不再继续打扰他。” David Quammen, "The Brilliant Plodder" (review of Ken Thompson, Darwin's Most Wonderful Plants: A Tour of His Botanical Legacy, University of Chicago Press, 255 pp.; Elizabeth Hennessy, On the Backs of Tortoises: Darwin, the Galápagos, and the Fate of an Evolutionary Eden, Yale University Press, 310 pp.; Bill Jenkins, Evolution Before Darwin: Theories of the Transmutation of Species in Edinburgh, 1804–1834, Edinburgh University Press, 222 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXVII, no. 7 (23 April 2020), pp. 22–24. Quammen, quoted from p. 24 of his review.
 
大卫·夸曼David Quammen写下了他的观点,“达尔文转向了这些神秘的植物学研究–出版了多本经过实证研究的,谨慎的进化论书,却“极其令人生厌”–但是至少在某种程度上,让那些为争夺猿猴,天使和灵魂而战的吵闹争论者不再继续打扰他。” David Quammen, "The Brilliant Plodder" (review of Ken Thompson, Darwin's Most Wonderful Plants: A Tour of His Botanical Legacy, University of Chicago Press, 255 pp.; Elizabeth Hennessy, On the Backs of Tortoises: Darwin, the Galápagos, and the Fate of an Evolutionary Eden, Yale University Press, 310 pp.; Bill Jenkins, Evolution Before Darwin: Theories of the Transmutation of Species in Edinburgh, 1804–1834, Edinburgh University Press, 222 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXVII, no. 7 (23 April 2020), pp. 22–24. Quammen, quoted from p. 24 of his review.
 +
    
==Citations==
 
==Citations==
  −
| title = Evolution: The History of an Idea
  −
  −
进化: 思想的历史
  −
   
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}
 
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}
  −
| edition = 3rd
  −
  −
3 rd
  −
  −
  −
  −
| publisher = University of California Press
  −
  −
加利福尼亚大学出版社
      
==References==
 
==References==
961

个编辑