第498行: |
第498行: |
| : <math> \Pi(i) = \frac{k_i} N \frac{ \sum_{j=1}^{k_i} \frac 1 {k_j} }{k_i}.</math> | | : <math> \Pi(i) = \frac{k_i} N \frac{ \sum_{j=1}^{k_i} \frac 1 {k_j} }{k_i}.</math> |
| | | |
− | 在[[中介驱动依附模型|中介驱动依附(MDA)模型]]中,一个带有<math>m</math>边的新节点随机选择一个已连接的节点,然后不与那个节点连接,而是随机地与它的<math>m</math>个邻居连接。随机选择已连接节点的概率<math>\Pi(i)</math> 为 | + | 在[[中介驱动依附模型|中介驱动依附(MDA)模型]]中,一个带有<math>m</math>边的新节点随机选择一个已连接的节点,然后不与那个节点连接,而是随机地与它的<math>m</math>个相邻节点连接。随机选择已连接节点的概率<math>\Pi(i)</math> 为 |
| | | |
| : <math> \Pi(i) = \frac{k_i} N \frac{ \sum_{j=1}^{k_i} \frac 1 {k_j} }{k_i}.</math> | | : <math> \Pi(i) = \frac{k_i} N \frac{ \sum_{j=1}^{k_i} \frac 1 {k_j} }{k_i}.</math> |
第510行: |
第510行: |
| the PA rule but in disguise.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Hassan | first1 = M. K. | last2 = Islam | first2 = Liana | last3 = Arefinul Haque | first3 = Syed | date = March 2017 | title = Degree distribution, rank-size distribution, and leadership persistence in mediation-driven attachment networks | doi = 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.001 | journal = Physica A | volume = 469 | issue = | pages = 23–30 | arxiv = 1411.3444 | bibcode = 2017PhyA..469...23H }}</ref> | | the PA rule but in disguise.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Hassan | first1 = M. K. | last2 = Islam | first2 = Liana | last3 = Arefinul Haque | first3 = Syed | date = March 2017 | title = Degree distribution, rank-size distribution, and leadership persistence in mediation-driven attachment networks | doi = 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.001 | journal = Physica A | volume = 469 | issue = | pages = 23–30 | arxiv = 1411.3444 | bibcode = 2017PhyA..469...23H }}</ref> |
| | | |
− | 因子 <math>\frac{\sum_{j=1}^{k_i}{\frac{1}{k_j}}}{k_i}</math>是节点 <math>i</math>的<math>k_i</math>个相邻节点的度的调和平均(IHM)的逆。大量的数值研究表明,对于<math>m> 14</math>,IHM的值在大<math>N</math>极限下会变成常数,这意味着<math>\Pi(i) \propto k_i</math>。这表明一个节点的度越高,他就有更大的机会获得更多的连接,因为它们可以通过中介以更多的方式达到,这本质上体现了富人越富机制的直观思想(或者BA模型优先链接的规则)。因此,可以看出MDA网络遵循优先链接规则,但是是伪装的。<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Hassan | first1 = M. K. | last2 = Islam | first2 = Liana | last3 = Arefinul Haque | first3 = Syed | date = March 2017 | title = Degree distribution, rank-size distribution, and leadership persistence in mediation-driven attachment networks | doi = 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.001 | journal = Physica A | volume = 469 | issue = | pages = 23–30 | arxiv = 1411.3444 | bibcode = 2017PhyA..469...23H }}</ref> | + | 因子 <math>\frac{\sum_{j=1}^{k_i}{\frac{1}{k_j}}}{k_i}</math>是节点 <math>i</math>的<math>k_i</math>个相邻节点的度的调和平均(IHM)的逆。大量的数值研究表明,对于<math>m> 14</math>,IHM的值在大<math>N</math>极限下会变成常数,这意味着<math>\Pi(i) \propto k_i</math>。这表明一个节点的连接(度)越高,获得更多连接的机会就更大,因为它们可以通过中介以更多的方式连接到,这本质上体现了富人越富机制的直观思想(或者BA模型优先链接的规则)。因此,可以看出MDA网络以伪装的方式遵循优先链接规则。<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Hassan | first1 = M. K. | last2 = Islam | first2 = Liana | last3 = Arefinul Haque | first3 = Syed | date = March 2017 | title = Degree distribution, rank-size distribution, and leadership persistence in mediation-driven attachment networks | doi = 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.001 | journal = Physica A | volume = 469 | issue = | pages = 23–30 | arxiv = 1411.3444 | bibcode = 2017PhyA..469...23H }}</ref> |
| | | |
| | | |
| However, for <math>m=1</math> it describes the winner takes it all mechanism as we find that almost <math>99\%</math> of the total nodes have degree one and one is super-rich in degree. As <math>m</math> value increases the disparity between the super rich and poor decreases and as <math>m>14</math> we find a transition from rich get super richer to rich get richer mechanism. | | However, for <math>m=1</math> it describes the winner takes it all mechanism as we find that almost <math>99\%</math> of the total nodes have degree one and one is super-rich in degree. As <math>m</math> value increases the disparity between the super rich and poor decreases and as <math>m>14</math> we find a transition from rich get super richer to rich get richer mechanism. |
| | | |
− | 然而对于<math>m=1</math>,它表现了赢者通吃的机制,因为可以发现几乎<math>99\%</math> 的节点的度仅为1,而某一个节点的度超级大。当<math>m</math>的值增加时,超级富人和穷人之间的差距减小;当<math>m>14</math>时,我们发现了从赢者通吃机制到富人更富机制的转变。 | + | 然而对于<math>m=1</math>,它描述了赢者通吃的机制,因为可以发现几乎<math>99\%</math> 的节点的度仅为1,而某一个节点的度超级大。当<math>m</math>的值增加时,超级富人和穷人之间的差距减小;当<math>m>14</math>时,从赢者通吃机制转变为富人更富机制。 |
| | | |
| === 适应度模型 === | | === 适应度模型 === |